Skip to main content

Table 4 Mean FIS-8 and subscale scores by global item responses (brackets contain standard deviations unless otherwise indicated)

From: Concurrent validity of the short-form Family Impact Scale (FIS-8) in 4-year-old US children

   

Mean FIS-8 subscale scores

 

Number responding (%)

Mean FIS-8

Parental emotions

Parental/family activity

Family conflict

How much are your family’s daily lives affected by your child’s teeth, lips, jaws or mouth?a

 Not at all

297 (70.5)

1.2 (2.7)b

0.3 (0.7)b

0.7 (1.8)b

0.2 (0.7)b

 Very little

97 (23.0)

2.2 (3.3)

0.7 (1.1)

1.1 (2.0)

0.4 (0.8)

 Some

17 (4.0)

6.1 (5.6)

1.8 (2.0)

3.0 (3.5)

1.3 (1.6)

 A lot

7 (1.7)

5.1 (6.5)

1.4 (1.9)

2.7 (3.0)

1.0 (1.7)

 Very much

3 (0.7)

3.0 (1.0)

1.3 (1.5)

1.7 (2.1)

0.0 (0.0)

Spearman correlation

 

0.21

0.22

0.11

0.19

How would you describe the health of your child’s teeth and mouth?f

 Excellent

147 (35.0)

1.1 (2.6)b

0.3 (0.8)b

0.7 (1.8)b

0.2 (0.6)b

 Very good

176 (41.9)

1.5 (2.9)

0.5 (0.9)

0.9 (1.9)

0.2 (0.7)

 Good

76 (18.1)

2.1 (3.5)

0.6 (1.0)

1.0 (2.0)

0.4 (1.0)

 Fair

19 (4.5)

4.6 (4.8)

1.6 (1.5)

2.1 (3.1)

0.8 (1.1)

 Poor

2 (0.5)

12.0 (7.1)

4.0 (2.8)

5.0 (2.8)

3.0 (1.4)

Spearman correlation

 

0.28

0.23

0.22

0.22

All combined

422 (100.0)

1.7 (3.2)

0.5 (1.0)

0.9 (2.0)

0.3 (0.8)

  1. aOne missing response
  2. bP < 0.001; df = 4; Kruskal–Wallis H = 36.08
  3. cP < 0.001; df = 4; Kruskal–Wallis H = 26.68
  4. dP < 0.001; df = 4; Kruskal–Wallis H = 28.00
  5. eP < 0.001; df = 4; Kruskal–Wallis H = 29.00
  6. fTwo missing responses
  7. gP < 0.001; df = 4; Kruskal–Wallis H = 23.87
  8. hP < 0.001; df = 4; Kruskal–Wallis H = 32.60
  9. iP = 0.02; df = 4; Kruskal–Wallis H = 12.29
  10. jP < 0.001; df = 4; Kruskal–Wallis H = 34.91