Skip to main content

Table 3 Changes in KAP supporting a healthy lifestyle throughout the study (n = 76)

From: Effectiveness of a school-based intervention on knowledge, attitude and practice on healthy lifestyle and body composition in Malaysian adolescents

Variablea

 

IG (n = 34)

CG (n = 42)

Difference

Mean difference (95% CI)b

p-value

Mean difference (95% CI)b

p-value

Knowledge

Post I – Pre

3.71 (1.73, 5.68)*

< 0.001

1.81 (0.10, 3.52)*

0.035

Post II - Pre

3.82 (2.07, 5.58)*

< 0.001

2.24 (0.51, 3.97)*

0.007

Post II – Post I

0.12 (−1.76, 1.99)

1.000

0.43 (−0.85, 1.71)

1.000

Attitude

Post I – Pre

−0.53 (−5.20, 4.14)

1.000

2.83 (−1.73, 7.39)

0.385

Post II - Pre

−0.15 (−5.39, 5.09)

1.000

0.05 (−5.36, 5.45)

1.000

Post II – Post I

0.38 (−4.17, 4.94)

1.000

−2.79 (−6.80, 1.23)

0.272

Practice

Post I – Pre

2.85 (−7.64, 1.94)

0.428

2.48 (−1.82, 6.77)

0.472

Post II - Pre

−1.38 (−6.64, 3.88)

1.000

3.14 (−2.66, 8.94)

0.550

Post II – Post I

1.47 (−1.40, 4.34)

0.616

0.67 (−4.05, 5.38)

1.000

  1. *Significant difference (p < 0.05)
  2. aScore range: knowledge (0–32); attitude (24–144); practice (35–175). Higher scores in the respective scales indicate better knowledge of a healthy lifestyle, more positive attitudes towards a healthy lifestyle and a healthier lifestyle being practised
  3. bPairwise comparisons with Bonferroni adjustment for 95% confidence interval for the difference