Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: A national estimate of the birth prevalence of congenital anomalies in India: systematic review and meta-analysis

Original Submission
16 Feb 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maria João Fonseca
10 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fakir Yunus
17 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kim Waller
29 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aiguo Ren
2 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Prajkta Bhide
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maria João Fonseca
14 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aiguo Ren
27 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kim Waller
8 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Prajkta Bhide
Resubmission - Version 3
8 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Prajkta Bhide
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Prajkta Bhide
Resubmission - Version 5
11 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
16 May 2018 Editorially accepted
25 May 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12887-018-1149-0

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page