Skip to main content

Table 1 Sample characteristics by cash grant receipt (any grant vs. no grant into the child’s household)

From: Could cash and good parenting affect child cognitive development? A cross-sectional study in South Africa and Malawi

 

Total (n = 854)

Grant (n = 624)

No grant (n = 230)

X2 or F (df), p value

Country

 South Africa

708 (82.9%)

624 (88.1%)

84 (11.9%)

477.8 (1), p < 0.001

 Malawi

146 (17.1%)

0

146 (100%)

 

Child gender

 Boy

400 (47.7%)

289 (72.3%)

111 (27.8%)

0.13 (1), p = 0.76

 Girl

439 (52.3%)

322 (73.3%)

117 (26.7%)

 

Child age

10.21 (2.81)

9.99 (2.80)

10.80 (2.73)

14.02 (1), p < 0.001

Child HIV status

 HIV positive

115 (13.5%)

69 (60.0%)

46 (40.0%)

11.89 (1), p = 0.01

 HIV negative or unknown

737 (86.5%)

555 (75.3%)

182 (24.7%)

 

Home

 Living in a house or flat

689 (86.6%)

481 (69.8%)

208 (30.2%)

13.47 (1), p < 0.001

 Living in a shack

107 (13.4%)

93 (86.9%)

14 (13.1%)

 

N of household assets

3.90 (1.93)

2.60 (2.16)

4.38 (1.58)

173.15 (1), p < 0.001

Child cognitive outcomes

 Draw-a-person test

91.25 (17.28)

95.29 (14.92)

80.34 (18.47)

144.90 (1), p < 0.001

 Digit span test

8.97 (3.56)

9.34 (3.54)

7.98 (3.44)

24.28 (1), p < 0.001

 Learning difficulty

0.20 (0.47)

0.15 (0.43)

0.33 (0.56)

26.43 (1), p < 0.001

 Remembering difficulty

0.34 (0.58)

0.31 (0.56)

0.42 (0.63)

6.68 (1), p = 0.01

 Comprehension difficulty

0.04 (0.24)

0.04 (0.20)

0.07 (0.32)

3.91 (1), p = 0.048

 Total cognitive difficulties

0.58 (1.04)

0.49 (0.94)

0.83 (1.24)

17.99 (1), p < 0.001