Table 4 Methodological quality of measurement properties on validity, responsiveness and best evidence synthesis
Instrument | Author | Validity | Responsiveness | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Version | Content validity | Structural validity | Hypothesis testing | ||||
WST | |||||||
1.0 | Kirby 2002 [34] | ||||||
Substudy 1: total score | fair/indeterminate | . | fair/positive | . | |||
Substudy 2: Item score | . | . | . | . | |||
2.4 | Kirby 2004 [20] | ||||||
Substudy 1: total score | . | . | fair/positive | . | |||
Substudy 2: Item score | . | . | . | . | |||
Level of evidence | unknown | na | moderate positive | na | |||
WPT | |||||||
Askari 2013 [47] | good/positive | good/indeterminate | good/positive | . | |||
Level of evidence | moderate positive | unknown | moderate positive | na | |||
WC | |||||||
Kilkens 2002 [30] | . | . | . | . | |||
Kilkens 2004 [31] | . | . | fair/positive | fair/positive | |||
AM-WC | Cowan 2011 [32] | . | . | good/negative | . | ||
WAIMS | Vereecken 2012 [33] | . | . | fair/positive | . | ||
Level of evidence | na | na | conflicting | limited positive | |||
TOWM Wheelie | |||||||
Fliess-Douer 2012 [37] | poor/indeterminate | . | . | . | |||
Fliess-Douer 2013(a) [36] | |||||||
Substudy 1: quality item score | . | . | . | . | |||
Substudy 2: other scores | . | . | . | . | |||
Fliess-Douer 2013(b) [38] | poor/indeterminate | . | poor/indeterminate | . | |||
Level of evidence | unknown | na | unknown | na | |||
TOMP | |||||||
Gans 1988 [49] | . | . | . | . | |||
Level of evidence | na | na | na | na | |||
HMAT | |||||||
Harvey 1998 [39] | . | . | . | . | |||
Level of evidence | na | na | na | na | |||
FIM +5-AML | |||||||
Middleton 2006 [42] | . | fair/positive | fair/positive | fair/positive | |||
Level of evidence | na | limited positive | limited positive | limited positive | |||
VFM | |||||||
Taricco 2000 [46] | . | fair/indeterminate | poor/indeterminate | fair/indeterminate | |||
Level of evidence | na | unknown | unknown | unknown | |||