Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
19 Sep 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
31 Oct 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Sten Vermund |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
31 Oct 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
9 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Glenda Gray |
2 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Helene Cote |
9 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gonzague Jourdain |
14 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Leonardo Palombi |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
24 Apr 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Sten Vermund |
5 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gonzague Jourdain |
7 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Helene Cote |
8 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Leonardo Palombi |
19 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Glenda Gray |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Apr 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
7 Aug 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Aug 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-9-49 |
You can find further information about peer review here.