Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 9 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Meghan McGrady |
| 10 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Scott Burgess |
| 15 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mary Irvine |
| 22 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ruth Jepson |
| 8 Jan 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Miriam Santer |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 8 Jan 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 26 Jan 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Meghan McGrady |
| 27 Jan 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Scott Burgess |
| 29 Jan 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ruth Jepson |
| 4 Feb 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mary Irvine |
| 19 Feb 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Miriam Santer |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 19 Feb 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 24 Feb 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Miriam Santer |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 24 Feb 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 24 Feb 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 4 Mar 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-14-63 |
You can find further information about peer review here.