Skip to main content

Table 4 Fat-free mass determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and derived equations based on different resistance indices (RI)

From: Bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition, and change in adiposity, in overweight and obese adolescents: comparison with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry

Method

Group A (n = 33)

Group B (n = 33)

P

DXA Mean ± SD (kg)

47.9 ± 12.6

46.9 ± 10.9

0.682

H2/R50

 

Mean ± SD (kg)

48.3 ± 11.4

46.5 ± 10.8

0.519

Bias (kg)

0.4

-0.5

 

Limits of agreement (kg)

-6.8 to 7.6

-7.9 to 7.0

 

r c (95% CI)

0.95 (0.91 – 0.97)

0.94 (0.88 – 0.97)

 

H2/R

 

Mean ± SD (kg)

48.3 ± 11.4

46.5 ± 10.6

0.516

Bias (kg)

0.4

-0.4

 

Limits of agreement (kg)

-7.5 to 8.2

-7.5 to 6.6

 

r c (95% CI)

0.94 (0.89 – 0.97)

0.94 (0.89 – 0.97)

 

H2/Zc

 

Mean ± SD (kg)

48.1 ± 11.3

46.7 ± 11.2

0.612

Bias (kg)

0.2

-0.2

 

Limits of agreement (kg)

-6.9 to 7.2

-8.6 to 8.1

 

r c (95% CI)

0.95 (0.91 – 0.98)

0.93 (0.85 – 0.96)

 
  1. RI examined were height2/resistance 50 kHz (H2/R50), height2/estimated resistance at infinity (H2/R) and height2/impedance at characteristic frequency (H2/Zc).