Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment of included studies*

From: A systematic review of the prevalence of parental concerns measured by the Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS)indicating developmental risk

First author

Year

Random sample or whole population

Unbiased sampling frame (i.e. census data)

Adequate sample size (>300 subjects)

Measures were the standard

Outcomes measured by unbiased assessors

Adequate response rate (70%) and refusers described

Confidence intervals and subgroup analysis

Study subjects descirbed

Quality risk rating/8

Bethell

2011

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

8

NSCH

2011/2012

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

8

CHIS

2003

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

7

CHIS

2005

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

7

CHIS

2009

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

7

CHIS

2007

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

7

Ibironke

2011

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

7

Zuckerman

2009

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

7

Glascoe

2013

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

6

Stevens

2006

1

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

6

Ng

2010

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

6

Restall

2009

1

1

0

1

1

0

1

1

6

VSEHQ

2008

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

6

Davies

2009

1

1

0

1

1

1

0

0

5

Glascoe

1999

0

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

5

Glascoe

1997

0

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

5

Rose Jacobs

2008

0

0

1

1

1

1

0

1

5

Glascoe

2010

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

4

Glascoe

2010

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

4

Kosht-Fedyshin

2006

1

0

0

1

1

0

0

1

4

Limbos

2011

0

0

1

1

1

1

0

1

5

Oreto

2010

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

4

Tough

2008

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

4

Armstrong

2008

0

1

0

1

 

0

0

1

3

Campos

2010

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

0

3

Coghlan

2003

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

1

3

Kiing

2012

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

0

3

McGookin

2011

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

0

3

Palarca

2008

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

3

Roux

2011

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

0

3

Theeranate

2005

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

1

3

Wake

2005

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

0

3

Gustawan

2010

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

1

3

Chuan

2012

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

2

Mahli

2002

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

2

Matibag

2008

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

2

Sices

2009

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

2

  1. *Quality rating system as per quality rating tool developed by Public Health Agency in Canada [19].