Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of statistically significant items in the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale (IIFAS) between mothers who exclusively breastfed to 6 months and those who did not: Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition (APrON) study 1,2

From: Predictors of exclusive breastfeeding: observations from the Alberta pregnancy outcomes and nutrition (APrON) study

IIFAS items

Exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months

Difference mean ± SD

No

Yes

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

n = 254

n = 46

Formula feeding is more convenient than breastfeeding (R)3

4.03 ± 0.97

4.36 ± 0.82

−0.32 ± 0.16

Formula feeding is the better choice if the mother plans to go back to work (R)3

3.74 ± 0.89

4.07 ± 0.78

−0.33 ± 0.15

Mothers who formula feed miss one of the great joys of motherhood

3.29 ± 1.08

3.76 ± 1.03

−0.48 ± 0.18

Women should not breastfeed in public places such as restaurants (R)3

4.30 ± 0.83

4.64 ± 0.58

−0.34 ± 0.11

Formula is as healthy for an infant as breast milk (R)3

3.43 ± 1.00

3.81 ± 0.80

−0.38 ± 0.14

Breastfeeding is more convenient than formula

3.97 ± 0.96

4.33 ± 0.79

−0.37 ± 0.16

  1. SD: Standard deviation.
  2. 1Of total 17 IIFAS items, only statistically significant scale items (n = 6) are shown due to copy-right restrictions (Independent sample t-test, 2-sided p-value < 0.05).
  3. 2IIFAS is comprised of 17 items and responses are on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”. Total score ranges from 17-85, with higher scores indicating more positive attitudes toward breastfeeding.
  4. 3(R) indicates reverse-coded items.