Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
14 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
15 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Johan Denollet |
1 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paula M.C. Mommersteeg |
30 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Emelie Condén |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
30 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
2 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paula M.C. Mommersteeg |
22 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Emelie Condén |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
22 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paula M.C. Mommersteeg |
8 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Emelie Condén |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
8 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
9 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paula M.C. Mommersteeg |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Publishing | ||
10 Jan 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Jan 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-13-11 |
You can find further information about peer review here.