Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 29 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lesley Wiart |
| 5 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Margaret O'Neil |
| 12 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ingalill Larsson |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 12 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 12 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ingalill Larsson |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 12 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 13 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lesley Wiart |
| 1 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ingalill Larsson |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 1 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 12 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lesley Wiart |
| 31 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ingalill Larsson |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 31 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 7 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ingalill Larsson |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 7 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 2 Jul 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 2 Jul 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-12-90 |
You can find further information about peer review here.