Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
28 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
16 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Davidovitch |
21 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alfons Macaya |
8 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Carrie Daymont |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
8 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
13 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alfons Macaya |
9 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Davidovitch |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
14 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Carrie Daymont |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
14 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
19 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Carrie Daymont |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
19 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
23 Jan 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
23 Jan 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-12-9 |
You can find further information about peer review here.