Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
7 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter M. Wehmeier |
6 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Almut Winterstein |
4 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzanne McCarthy |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
4 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
30 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Almut Winterstein |
13 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzanne McCarthy |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
18 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Almut Winterstein |
21 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzanne McCarthy |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
31 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Almut Winterstein |
20 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzanne McCarthy |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
20 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
11 Jun 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
19 Jun 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-12-78 |
You can find further information about peer review here.