Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 7 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Patrick |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 7 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 18 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lorraine Wallace |
| 4 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joan Robinson |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 27 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Morris |
| 28 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rafael Perera |
| 13 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Patrick |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 13 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 14 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joan Robinson |
| 4 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Morris |
| 13 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rafael Perera |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Aug 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-12-134 |
You can find further information about peer review here.