Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
7 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Patrick |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
7 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
18 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lorraine Wallace |
4 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joan Robinson |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
27 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Morris |
28 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rafael Perera |
13 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Patrick |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
13 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
14 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joan Robinson |
4 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Morris |
13 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rafael Perera |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Publishing | ||
23 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Aug 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-12-134 |
You can find further information about peer review here.