Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 16 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Reilly |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 16 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 2 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mai Jeanette Maidy Chinapaw |
| 9 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Louise Hardy |
| 23 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Reilly |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 23 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 8 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Louise Hardy |
| 17 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mai Jeanette Maidy Chinapaw |
| 20 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Reilly |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 20 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 24 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Reilly |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 24 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 26 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Reilly |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 26 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-11-97 |
You can find further information about peer review here.