Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
16 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Reilly |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
2 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mai Jeanette Maidy Chinapaw |
9 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Louise Hardy |
23 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Reilly |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
8 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Louise Hardy |
17 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mai Jeanette Maidy Chinapaw |
20 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Reilly |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
24 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Reilly |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
24 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
26 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Reilly |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
26 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
28 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-11-97 |
You can find further information about peer review here.