Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
24 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jean-Michel Liet |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
24 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
9 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kent Thorburn |
20 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christer Sinderby |
5 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jean-Michel Liet |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
5 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
22 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christer Sinderby |
9 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jean-Michel Liet |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
9 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
14 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jean-Michel Liet |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
14 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
18 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jean-Michel Liet |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
18 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
20 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-11-92 |
You can find further information about peer review here.