Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 18 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Katherine Poehling |
| 28 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Julie Leask |
| 9 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Payne |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 9 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 18 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Julie Leask |
| 17 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Payne |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 17 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 12 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Payne |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 12 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 20 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Payne |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 20 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 23 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Payne |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 23 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 26 Sep 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Sep 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-11-83 |
You can find further information about peer review here.