Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 14 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nadja Schroder |
| 9 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Torben Moos |
| 20 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tracey Rouault |
| 2 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Anna LAVEZZI |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 2 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 16 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nadja Schroder |
| 16 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Torben Moos |
| 22 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tracey Rouault |
| 6 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Inderjeet Dokal |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 4 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Anna LAVEZZI |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 4 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 6 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Anna LAVEZZI |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 6 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Jul 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Jul 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-11-62 |
You can find further information about peer review here.