Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
30 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Claus Gravholt |
4 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean-Claude Carel |
9 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Shayne Taback |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
9 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean-Claude Carel |
10 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Claus Gravholt |
20 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Shayne Taback |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
20 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Shayne Taback |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
28 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
18 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Shayne Taback |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
18 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
29 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
29 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-11-49 |
You can find further information about peer review here.