Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 4 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Frye |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 4 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 30 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Morrier |
| 20 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Barbara Myers |
| 27 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Frye |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 27 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 21 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Morrier |
| 15 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Barbara Myers |
| 29 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Frye |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 29 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 25 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Morrier |
| 9 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Frye |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 9 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 13 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Frye |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 13 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 18 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 18 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-11-37 |
You can find further information about peer review here.