Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 22 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Raja Brauner |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 22 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 12 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jacques Donnez |
| 27 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kirsi Jahnukainen |
| 6 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joop Laven |
| 23 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Raja Brauner |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 23 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 9 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jacques Donnez |
| 10 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kirsi Jahnukainen |
| 19 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Raja Brauner |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 19 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 9 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kirsi Jahnukainen |
| 14 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jacques Donnez |
| 17 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raja Brauner |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 17 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 22 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raja Brauner |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 22 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 25 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 25 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-11-20 |
You can find further information about peer review here.