Level | Study outcome | Measurement tool | Psychometric properties | Assessment |
---|---|---|---|---|
Body structures and functions | Muscle endurance | Six-Minute Bicycle Test* | Feasible for ambulant and non-ambulant boys with DMD (pilot study, unpublished data) | T0, T2, T5 |
 | Joint mobility (PROM) | Goniometry[55] (knee ext*, ankle dfl*, shoulder abd*▪, elbow ext*▪, wrist ext▪, wrist radial and ulnar dev▪) | Standardized methods are feasible[56] and have good intra- and inter-rater reliability in DMD[57] Passive wrist radial deviation is correlated with functional hand activities[58] and lower extremity contractures are related to onset of wheelchair reliance in DMD[4] | All |
 | Muscle strength | Modified MRC[59] (hip ext*, knee ext* ankle dfl*, shoulder abd*▪, elbow ext*▪, wrist ext▪) | Moderate to good intra-rater reliability[59] and acceptable inter-rater reliability in DMD after a training session[60] Muscles with MRC grade 4 or 5 are difficult to measure with MMT, but muscles with MRC grade ≤3 are more difficult to measure with HHD[4] | All |
 | Muscle atrophy, intra-muscular fibrosis and fatty infiltration | Quantitative skeletal muscle ultrasonography (muscle thickness and echo intensity) [61]: RF, TA, BB, FF*▪ | Good inter-rater agreement in children[62] High predictive values to discriminate between children with and without a NMD[63] | T2, T5, T6/T7* |
 | Bone density | Dexascan (femur and lumbar spine)* | Changes in bone mineral density can be detected with confidence in healthy boys ≥10 years after 6 months and in younger boys after 12 months[64], but a change in body shape may influence scan results[65] | Conventional protocol for each boy |
 | Incidence of fractures | Semi-structured interview* |  | All |
Activities | Functional abilities | Motor Function Measure[37] (D1*, D2*, D3*â–ª) | Excellent internal consistency for the global scale and the subscales in NMD[37] Excellent to moderate intra- and inter-rater reliability in NMD[37] Good face validity, convergent validity and discriminant validity in NMD[37] Sufficiently sensitive to detect changes in the total score in DMD[66] Total score predicts loss of ambulation in DMD[67] | All |
 | Upper limb function | Excellent intra-rater, inter-rater and test-retest reliability in stroke patients[40, 41] Highly correlated with the Fugl-Meyer score47 and Functional Independence Measure48 in stroke patients Suitable to detect changes over time in stroke patients[42] | All | |
 | Functional abilities (grading) | Vignos* and Brooke Scale*▪ [56] | Good inter-rater and intra-rater reliability[57, 57] and correlated with timed tests[46, 68, 69] in DMD | All |
 | Functional mobility | Functional Mobility Scale[70] * | A clinically feasible, valid and reliable tool in CP[70, 71] | All |
 | Functional abilities (timed tests) | Timed and graded functional tests (and total GSGC score) [72]: walk 10 meters, climb 3 stairs, rise from the floor and rise from a chair* | Good to excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability in DMD[57, 73] Sensitive to change in DMD: a small reduction in muscle force was accompanied by a large increase in time it takes to complete functional tests[74] | All (gait, stairs and chair only in the hospital) |
 | Finger dexterity | Nine-hole Peg Test[75] *▪ | Moderately high test-retest reliability, high inter-rater agreement and adequate concurrent validity in school-age children[76] | All |
 | Hand function | Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test[77] ▪ | Good test-retest reliability in DMD[58] Strongly correlated with muscle strength of the wrist extensors[58], radial deviation range of motion[58] and the Brooke scale[46] in DMD | T2, T4, T5 |
 | Functional status | Good inter-rater and test-retest reliability[80], content validity[79] and discriminative validity[81] in children with various diagnosis | T0, T2, T4, T6/T7* | |
 | Perceived manual abilities | The Rasch-derived Abilhand is moderately related to grip and key pinch strength, has good test-retest reliability and may be sensitive to change in stroke patients[85] The Abilhand-kids has good test-retest reliability and a higher independence in gross motor function is associated with a higher manual ability in CP[84] | T0, T2, T4, T6/T7* | |
 | Quality of upper-limb motor function | Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function[86] (item 1,2,3,10,11 and16) extended with an upper limb motion analysis (Vicon Motion Systems) with 8 cameras▪ | The Melbourne Assessment has moderate to high intra- and inter-rater reliability[87] and excellent construct validity in CP[88] A motion capture analysis system can measure task performance with an upper-limb orthosis[45], but soft tissue artefacts may negatively influence accuracy[49] | T2, T4 |
 | Incidence and fear of falls | Semi-structured interview* |  | All |
Participation | HRQoL | KIDSCREEN-52[89](child- and parental questionnaire)*â–ª | Acceptable levels of reliability and validity in children and adolescents[90] Children's most important in their lives generally map well to the items in KIDSCREEN[91] | T0, T2, T4, T6/T7* |
Demographic variables | Weight and height | Body weight (kg)*â–ª, standing height* (cm) and arm-span*â–ª (cm) | Â | T0*, T2, T4, Y6/T7* |
Co-factors | Co-interventions | Semi-structured interview*â–ª | Â | All |
 | Physical activity | Semi-structured interview (according to the PAQ-C[92] and the 60-min MVPA measure[93])*▪ |  | All |