Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
19 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Apr 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Nyeko |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
1 Apr 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
27 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Oscar Brunser |
31 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Viroj Wiwanitkit |
18 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Guerrant |
31 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Nyeko |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
31 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Nyeko |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
29 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
8 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Oscar Brunser |
28 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Nyeko |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
28 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
28 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Nyeko |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
28 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
4 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Nyeko |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
4 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
8 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Oscar Brunser |
30 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Nyeko |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
30 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
6 May 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
6 May 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-10-31 |
You can find further information about peer review here.