Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Denney-Wilson |
30 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Turid Lingaas Holmen |
13 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - David Tybor |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
3 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Denney-Wilson |
12 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Turid Lingaas Holmen |
21 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Giorgio Bedogni |
9 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - David Tybor |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
25 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Giorgio Bedogni |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
7 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - David Tybor |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
7 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
21 Jan 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Jan 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-10-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.