A case of ultrasound-guided prenatal diagnosis of prune belly syndrome in Papua New Guinea – implications for management
© Ome et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 27 October 2012
Accepted: 3 May 2013
Published: 7 May 2013
Prune belly syndrome is a rare congenital malformation of unknown aetiology and is characterised by abnormalities of the urinary tract, a deficiency of abdominal musculature and bilateral cryptorchidism in males. We report a case of prune belly syndrome from Papua New Guinea, which was suspected on pregnancy ultrasound scan and confirmed upon delivery.
A 26-year-old married woman, Gravida 3 Para 2, presented to antenatal clinic in Madang, Papua New Guinea, at 21+5 weeks’ gestation by dates. She was well with no past medical or family history of note. She gave consent to participate in a clinical trial on prevention of malaria in pregnancy and underwent repeated ultrasound examinations which revealed a live fetus with persistent megacystis and anhydramnios. Both mother and clinicians agreed on conservative management of the congenital abnormality. The mother spontaneously delivered a male fetus weighing 2010 grams at 34 weeks’ gestation with grossly abnormal genitalia including cryptorchidism, penile aplasia and an absent urethral meatus, absent abdominal muscles and hypoplastic lungs. The infant passed away two hours after delivery. This report discusses the implications of prenatal detection of severe congenital abnormalities in PNG.
This first, formally reported, case of prune belly syndrome from a resource-limited setting in the Oceania region highlights the importance of identifying and documenting congenital abnormalities. Women undergoing antenatal ultrasound examinations must be carefully counseled on the purpose and the limitations of the scan. The increasing use of obstetric ultrasound in PNG will inevitably result in a rise in prenatal detection of congenital abnormalities. This will need to be met with adequate training, referral mechanisms and better knowledge of women’s attitudes and beliefs on birth defects and ultrasound. National medicolegal guidance regarding induced abortion and resuscitation of a fetus with severe congenital abnormalities may be required.
KeywordsCongenital abnormality Eagle-Barrett syndrome Management Papua New Guinea Prenatal diagnosis Prune belly syndrome Ultrasound
First described by Frölich in 1839 , prune belly syndrome (PBS), also known as Eagle-Barrett syndrome  or Obrinsky syndrome , is a congenital disorder affecting 2.5 to 3.8 per 100,000 live births [4, 5]. It is largely but not exclusively confined to males [4, 6], and is defined clinically by a combination of abnormalities of the urinary tract such as the absence or partial obstruction of the urethra and renal dysplasia, a deficiency of abdominal musculature and bilateral cryptorchidism in males . Other fetal malformations which may be associated with PBS include gastrointestinal, cardiac, pulmonary and limb abnormalities . Prenatal ultrasound features can include oligo- or anhydramnios, megacystis, hydronephrosis, and hyperechogenic kidneys . To date, a clear genetic basis for PBS has not been established and the aetiology of the syndrome is unknown . It is thought that PBS arises from a defect in the intermediate and lateral plate mesoderm development during the 6th to 10th week of gestation, resulting in clinical abnormalities [9, 11, 12].
In high-income countries, most cases of PBS are diagnosed antenatally through ultrasound, and confirmed at birth [9, 13]. By contrast, in resource-limited settings such as Papua New Guinea (PNG) prenatal diagnosis of congenital abnormalities remains unreported, and documentation of congenital abnormalities observed after delivery is rare [14–17].
The use of ultrasound to complement antenatal care in PNG is relatively recent  and is restricted to a small number of facilities or medical research projects . It depends on the presence of specialists with ultrasound training (obtained abroad), and machines are usually donated and rarely procured through governmental funds. Scans are not provided routinely as part of antenatal care in PNG; however, when available and clinically indicated, women are referred for confirmation of gestational age, diagnosis of multiple gestation, and assessment of suspected placental and amniotic fluid level abnormalities.
This is the first formal report of PBS in PNG and other resource-limited settings in the South Pacific, and was first suspected on ultrasound. It highlights challenges clinicians in PNG are facing when counseling affected parents on diagnosis and prognosis of severe congenital abnormalities detected prenatally.
The mother of the patient was a 26-year-old, married, Gravida 3 Para 2 (two healthy children 5 and 3 years old, uncomplicated spontaneous vaginal deliveries at term) who presented to an urban clinic in Madang, PNG, in April 2012 for routine antenatal booking of a planned pregnancy at 21+5 weeks’ gestation by dates.
The mother gave informed written consent to join a randomised controlled trial that took place at the clinic at the time. The purpose of the trial was to examine the effect of intermittent preventive therapy in pregnancy (IPTp) with azithromycin and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) on reducing the proportion of babies born with low birthweight [20, 21], and women were followed up until delivery. As part of the study, participants were offered an ultrasound examination (USS) by a research clinician (Logiqbook XP, General Electric Medical Systems, Little Chalfont, UK). The main purpose of the scan was to corroborate clinical history and examination data by providing an additional, more accurate estimate of gestational age (to detect preterm births) and to screen for twin pregnancies. Scans were performed during a separate research ultrasound clinic visit within a week of enrollment into the study.
Upon presentation the mother was well and had no complaints. There was no past medical and family history of note. She was a non-smoker, had not consumed alcohol during this pregnancy, and had a normal body mass index (20.1 kg/m2). She reported regular fetal movements since 19 weeks’ gestation. Observations taken on the day were normal for gestation (blood pressure 88/54, heart rate: 86 beats per minute, temperature 36.5°C). On abdominal palpation the fundal height was 23 cms. A fetal heart rate of 144 beats per minute was observed, fetal lie was longitudinal and presentation was cephalic. She was mildly anaemic (haemoglobin = 9.6 g/dL) (Hemocue, Quest Diagnostics, Madison, USA) and was given dietary advice. She received IPTp with azithromycin 1g twice daily for two days and a single dose of SP of 1500/75 mg as per trial protocol.
The mother underwent three ultrasound scans (USS) in total: the first ultrasound examination was performed by a research clinician two days after initial presentation at 22+0 weeks, at which time the fetal abnormality was detected. The mother was withdrawn from study treatments and referred to the hospital clinical team. The research clinician conducted a further ultrasound examination at 24+1 weeks, which was followed by a third USS was performed at 24+3 weeks’ gestation at hospital.
The mother was admitted to hospital at 24+3 weeks’ gestation for further assessment and a provisional diagnosis of megacystis and anhydramnios secondary to urethral obstruction or atresia was made. The mother (partner unavailable) was informed of the likely poor prognosis. She was counselled about strategies for further care, which included conservative management and termination of pregnancy using misoprostol, as well as palliative treatment versus resuscitation at delivery. The mother opted for non-interventional management and neonatal resuscitation if signs of life were present at birth. She was discharged and outpatient follow-up by both study and hospital clinicians was arranged.
The mother returned for one more antenatal visit at 26+5 weeks’ gestation during which she was provided with IPTp (SP as per national protocol), and iron and folic acid supplements and albendazole to treat her worsening anaemia (haemoglobin = 7.6 g/dL). Observations remained within normal range (35.8°C, blood pressure 98/51, heart rate 65, respiratory rate 20), and the fundal height was 25 cms.
To our knowledge, this is the first case of PBS formally reported from PNG and other resource-limited regions in Oceania. In addition, it is the first report from PNG of prenatal diagnosis of a severe congenital abnormality using ultrasound technology.
The burden of birth defects in low-resource countries remains relatively under-researched and has been recognised as a target for studies and surveillance [27, 28]. Information on the prevalence and characteristic of congenital abnormalities in PNG is limited [14–17]. Reporting and analysis of congenital abnormalities from low-resource environment such as PNG could be improved by establishing an international online passive surveillance system. Here, clinicians could submit case reports online and receive additional information and diagnostic support.
The ultrasound findings of anhydramnios and megacystis, in combination with the notable absence of a urethral meatus, a hypoplastic chest and the absence of anterior abdominal wall musculature on physical examination, strongly support a diagnosis of PBS in this patient, despite the lack of more detailed ultrasound or pathology data to corroborate these findings. Clinicians did not have the necessary training and experience to confidently detect PBS-related abnormalities on ultrasound, such as polycystic or dysplastic kidneys, hydronephrosis, lung hypoplasia, fetal ascites, and absent abdominal wall musculature [7, 9], and autopsy facilities and a pathologist were unavailable.
PBS comprises a spectrum of mild to severe presentations . This patient’s prenatal features of persistent mid-second trimester anhydramnios and megacystis pointed towards the uniformly lethal end of the spectrum of the syndrome [29, 30]. Although the final diagnosis could only be made after delivery, a poor prognosis for the fetus was evident based on the observed ultrasound features alone. Furthermore, capacities for complex postpartum surgical interventions  are largely absent in PNG. In such clinical circumstances the survival of the fetus is very unlikely and he should be considered a dying patient . Given its detection before fetal viability mothers ‘should be explained the nature and prognosis of the anomaly and offered both continuation of the pregnancy or induced abortion’ . This was done in this case, and both mother and clinicians opted for non-intervention and monitoring. However, in order to reduce anxiety and the risks of over- or under-interventions, a more guarded response to parents may be more appropriate when significant uncertainties regarding the prognosis remain. Further advice should be sought when possible (e.g. ultrasound images could be sent elsewhere for verification). If a clear prognosis cannot be established, delivery should be awaited and mothers counseled accordingly. Intervention may then only become necessary should the fetal abnormality pose a threat to the mother’s health, such as hydrocephalus, increasing the risk of obstructed labour.
The limitations of ultrasound, and the limitations of the skill set of those performing ultrasound, must be highlighted to parents prior to scanning. In hospital practice, ultrasound complements, not replaces, routine clinical history and examination. Clarifying the purpose of the scan with the mother (e.g. dating the pregnancy) and reiterating that a scan does not rule out problems (congenital abnormality, obstetric complications) is very important in order to ensure that no harm is done. This is even more important when ultrasound is used as part of medical research. The mother of the patient was counseled to this effect at enrollment into the trial, was immediately withdrawn from the study upon detection of the abnormality, and was promptly referred to, and reviewed by, the most senior obstetric doctor in the region. The introduction of ultrasound in obstetric practice in PNG somewhat compares to introduction of a completely new medical technology to clinical practice in a high-income country : it is the clinicians’ responsibility to be adequately trained and experienced prior to using information gathered through safe application of this technology to guide subsequent patient management. Ultrasound can assist doctors greatly but both mothers and doctors must recognise the limitations of the operators’ skill set and the technology overall. Introducing a national training curriculum for obstetric and gynaecological ultrasound could assist doctors in guiding and standardising their scanning practice.
It is likely that the large majority of congenital abnormalities detected prenatally in PNG will be managed conservatively. Induced abortion may rarely be opted for by parents because termination of pregnancy for socio-economic reasons is illegal in PNG and subject to severe legal punishment. The only circumstance where termination is legal is when undertaken by a specialist to save the life of a pregnant woman (includes preservation of both physical and mental health) . In view of the current law (which is based on a British law from 1861 , now considerably amended in the UK), active management of this case (e.g. medical termination of pregnancy using misoprostol) could have been illegal. Future use of ultrasound technology for prenatal diagnostics in PNG should be carefully implemented in light of existing laws and ethical considerations.
Prenatal diagnosis of a severe congenital abnormality with poor prognosis for survival post-delivery must prompt clinicians to counsel parents regarding resuscitation of the newborn. Parents’ wishes must be respected, but counseling should explain the rationale behind no resuscitation or palliative treatment when there is sufficient certainty of a lethal outcome. In our case the mother’s request for neonatal resuscitation to be performed if signs of life were present at birth was respected. National guidance is not available but could be based on the principle that attempting neonatal resuscitation could be guided not only ‘by aetiology of the baby’s condition, but should take into account the expected outcome, what is thought to be the best interests of the baby, and the wishes of parents’ .
PNG is one of the most culturally diverse countries in the world. In addition to mapping the burden of birth defects in PNG, future research needs to evaluate the acceptability of ultrasound as part of antenatal care amongst women in PNG. Such findings can assist with developing culturally-appropriate guidelines, as observed elsewhere . Similarly, understanding beliefs and attitudes towards birth defects, and the impact of the latter on the acceptability of ultrasound, clinical research, induced abortion and palliative treatment of affected fetuses is urgently required.
In summary, prune belly syndrome, a rare congenital malformation, occurs in Papua New Guinea. Monitoring and reporting of birth defects in PNG could be improved. Women undergoing antenatal ultrasound examinations must be carefully counseled on the purpose and the limitations of the scan. The increasing use of obstetric ultrasound in resource-limited settings such as PNG will inevitably result in a rise in prenatal detection of congenital abnormalities. This will need to be met with adequate training, referral mechanisms and better knowledge of women’s attitudes and beliefs on ultrasound and birth defects. National medico-legal guidance regarding induced abortion and resuscitation of a fetus with severe congenital abnormalities is required.
Written informed consent for publication of this case report and accompanying images was obtained from the patient’s parents. A copy of the signed informed consent form is available for review by the Series Editor of BMC Pediatrics.
The mother of the infant gave informed written consent to participate in a prevention of malaria in pregnancy clinical trial (IPTp study), which was approved by the PNG IMR Institutional Review Board, PNG Medical Research Advisory Committee (MRAC) and the University of Melbourne Royal Melbourne Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee. The trial acts in compliance with the current revision of the Declaration of Helsinki, and with the International Conference for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) regulations and guidelines.
We thank the parents of our patient for their co-operation and support, and for providing consent for publication. We also thank the study and hospital nurses for their assistance with the management of this patient, and Professor Stephen Rogerson for his comments on earlier drafts of the article.
The IPTp study was supported by the Malaria in Pregnancy Consortium, which receives funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
- Frölich F: Der Mangel der Muskeln, insbesondere der Seitenbauchmuskeln. 1839, Würzburg: Dissertation
- Eagle JF, Barrett GS: Congenital deficiency of abdominal musculature with associated genitourinary abnormalities: A syndrome. Report of 9 cases. Pediatrics. 1950, 6 (5): 721-736.PubMed
- Obrinsky W: Agenesis of abdominal muscles with associated malformation of the genitourinary tract; a clinical syndrome. Am J Dis Child. 1949, 77 (3): 362-373.View ArticlePubMed
- Routh JC, Huang L, Retik AB, Nelson CP: Contemporary epidemiology and characterization of newborn males with prune belly syndrome. Urology. 2010, 76 (1): 44-48. 10.1016/j.urology.2009.12.072.View ArticlePubMed
- Baird PA, MacDonald EC: An epidemiologic study of congenital malformations of the anterior abdominal wall in more than half a million consecutive live births. Am J Hum Genet. 1981, 33 (3): 470-478.PubMed CentralPubMed
- Reinberg Y, Shapiro E, Manivel JC, Manley CB, Pettinato G, Gonzalez R: Prune belly syndrome in females: a triad of abdominal musculature deficiency and anomalies of the urinary and genital systems. J Pediatr. 1991, 118 (3): 395-398. 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)82153-5.View ArticlePubMed
- Tonni G, Ida V, Alessandro V, Bonasoni MP: Prune-belly syndrome: case series and review of the literature regarding early prenatal diagnosis, epidemiology, genetic factors, treatment, and prognosis. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2012, 31 (1): 13-24.PubMed
- Zugor V, Schott GE, Labanaris AP: The Prune Belly syndrome: urological aspects and long-term outcomes of a rare disease. Pediatr Rep. 2012, 4 (2): e20-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Osborne NG, Bonilla-Musoles F, Machado LE, Raga F, Bonilla F, Ruiz F, Perez Guardia CM, Ahluwalia B: Fetal megacystis: differential diagnosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2011, 30 (6): 833-841.PubMed
- Granberg CF, Harrison SM, Dajusta D, Zhang S, Hajarnis S, Igarashi P, Baker LA: Genetic basis of prune belly syndrome: screening for HNF1beta gene. J Urol. 2012, 187 (1): 272-278. 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.036.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Stephens FD, Gupta D: Pathogenesis of the prune belly syndrome. J Urol. 1994, 152 (6 Pt 2): 2328-2331.PubMed
- Schott G, Herrlinger A, Willital G: The prune-belly syndrome. Urologe A. 1982, 21 (6): 322-326.PubMed
- Yamamoto H, Nishikawa S, Hayashi T, Sagae S, Kudo R: Antenatal diagnosis of prune belly syndrome at 11 weeks of gestation. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2001, 27 (1): 37-40. 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2001.tb01213.x.View ArticlePubMed
- Jimmy S, Kemiki AD, Vince JD: Neonatal outcome at Modilon Hospital, Madang: a 5-year review. P N G Med J. 2003, 46 (1–2): 8-15.PubMed
- Poki HO, Shun A, Cooper MG, Paiva H: Gastroschisis management: an experience in Angau Memorial Hospital. P N G Med J. 2003, 46 (1–2): 41-45.PubMed
- Kaptigau WM, Ke L, Rosenfeld JV: Big heads in Port Moresby General Hospital: an audit of hydrocephalus cases seen from 2003 to 2004. P N G Med J. 2007, 50 (1–2): 44-49.PubMed
- Culverwell AD, Tapping CR: Congenital talipes equinovarus in Papua New Guinea: a difficult yet potentially manageable situation. Int Orthop. 2009, 33 (2): 521-526. 10.1007/s00264-007-0511-x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Amoa AB, Wapi J, Klufio CA: Longitudinal fetal biometry of normal pregnant Melanesian Papua New Guineans to construct standards of reference for Papua New Guinea. P N G Med J. 1993, 36 (3): 219-227.PubMed
- Tobian AA, Tarongka N, Baisor M, Bockarie M, Kazura JW, King CL: Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound detection and risk factors for filarial-associated hydroceles. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 68 (6): 638-642.PubMed
- Mueller I, Rogerson S, Mola GD, Reeder JC: A review of the current state of malaria among pregnant women in Papua New Guinea. P N G Med J. 2008, 51 (1–2): 12-16.PubMed
- Intermittent Preventive Treatment With Azithromycin-containing Regimens in Pregnant Women in Papua New Guinea (IPTp in PNG). http://clinicaltrials-lhc.nlm.nih.gov/ct2/show/NCT01136850,
- Loughna P, Chitty LTE, Chudleigh T: Fetal size and dating: charts recommended for clinical obstetric practice. Ultrasound. 2009, 17 (3): 161-167.
- Kofinas AD, Espeland MA, Penry M, Swain M, Hatjis CG: Uteroplacental Doppler flow velocity waveform indices in normal pregnancy: a statistical exercise and the development of appropriate reference values. Am J Perinatol. 1992, 9 (2): 94-101. 10.1055/s-2007-994679.View ArticlePubMed
- Acharya G, Wilsgaard T, Berntsen GK, Maltau JM, Kiserud T: Reference ranges for serial measurements of blood velocity and pulsatility index at the intra-abdominal portion, and fetal and placental ends of the umbilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 26 (2): 162-169. 10.1002/uog.1902.View ArticlePubMed
- Acharya G, Wilsgaard T, Berntsen GK, Maltau JM, Kiserud T: Reference ranges for serial measurements of umbilical artery Doppler indices in the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 192 (3): 937-944. 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.019.View ArticlePubMed
- Olofsson P, Olofsson H, Molin J, Marsal K: Low umbilical artery vascular flow resistance and fetal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004, 83 (5): 440-442.View ArticlePubMed
- World Health Organisation: Birth defects. http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA63/A63_10-en.pdf,
- International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (ICBDSR): Annual Report 2011 with data for 2009. 2011, Rome: ICBDSR
- FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health: Ethical issues in the management of severe congenital anomalies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013, 120 (3): 307-308.View Article
- Heuser CC, Eller AG, Byrne JL: Survey of physicians' approach to severe fetal anomalies. J Med Ethics. 2012, 38 (7): 391-395. 10.1136/medethics-2011-100340.View ArticlePubMed
- Chervenak F, McCullough LB: Responsibly counselling women about the clinical management of pregnancies complicated by severe fetal anomalies. J Med Ethics. 2012, 38 (7): 397-398. 10.1136/medethics-2012-100491.View ArticlePubMed
- Iserson KV, Chiasson PM: The ethics of applying new medical technologies. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2002, 9 (4): 222-229. 10.1053/slas.2002.36465.View ArticlePubMed
- McGoldrick IA: Termination of pregnancy in Papua New Guinea: the traditional and contemporary position. P N G Med J. 1981, 24 (2): 113-120.PubMed
- Response from the Faculty of Public Health to the Nuffield Council on Bioethics consultation on Ethics of Prolonging Life in Fetuses and the Newborn (June 2005). http://www.fph.org.uk/consultations,
- Rijken MJ, Gilder ME, Thwin MM, Ladda Kajeechewa HM, Wiladphaingern J, Lwin KM, Jones C, Nosten F, McGready R: Refugee and migrant women's views of antenatal ultrasound on the Thai Burmese border: a mixed methods study. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (4): e34018-10.1371/journal.pone.0034018.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/13/70/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.