Skip to main content

Table 5 Significant multivariable predictors of self-efficacy in managing environmental exposures

From: The Environment and Children’s Health Care in Northwest China

Exposure

Predictor (comparison group)

Odds of one point increase in Likert score (95% CI)

Lead

Xinjiang providers (compared with Gansu providers)

0.16 (0.06, 0.38)

Lead

Qinghai providers (compared with Gansu providers)

0.36 (0.18, 0.74)

Lead

Ningxia providers (compared with Gansu providers)

0.53 (0.32, 0.89)

Lead

Training in previous environmental history taking

1.99 (1.23, 3.22)

Mercury

Xinjiang providers (compared with Gansu providers)

0.11 (0.05, 0.27)

Mercury

Training in previous environmental history taking

2.12 (1.30, 3.47)

Pesticide

Xinjiang providers (compared with Gansu providers)

0.10 (0.04, 0.26)

Pesticide

Training in previous environmental history taking

2.52 (1.54, 4.11)

Air pollution

Xinjiang providers (compared with Gansu providers)

0.16 (0.06, 0.39)

Air pollution

Ningxia providers (compared with Gansu providers)

0.53 (0.31, 0.92)

Air pollution

Training in previous environmental history taking

2.70 (1.65, 4.44)

Mold

Xinjiang providers (compared with Gansu providers)

0.13 (0.05, 0.33)

Mold

Training in previous environmental history taking

2.23 (1.38, 3.61)

PCB

Xinjiang providers (compared with Gansu providers)

0.17 (0.06, 0.42)

PCB

Training in previous environmental history taking

2.72 (1.67, 4.42)

  1. For all Likert scales, multinomial logistic analyses were performed to predict odds of higher (or lower) beliefs/attitudes/practices towards the environment and children’s health, in relation to each of the following: age, gender, province, years in practice, practice type, percent public assistance and previous training in environmental history taking (except when previous training was the outcome), while controlling for all other variables. Results not listed imply p > 0.05.