Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of test feeding of RUSF

From: Development and acceptability testing of ready-to-use supplementary food made from locally available food ingredients in Bangladesh

 

Rice-Lentil based RUSF (n = 30)

Chickpea based RUSF (n = 30)

Pushti packet (n = 30)

P value1

P value2

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

 

1 vs .2

2 vs. 3

1 vs. 3

Mean Hedonic Scale (mean ± SD)

       

  Color of the supplement

6.9 ± 0.2

6.9 ± 0.3

6.8 ± 0.4

ns

-

-

-

  Aroma/flavor of the supplement

6.8 ± 0.4

6.8 ± 0.3

6.5 ± 0.6

0.042

ns

0.049

ns

  Texture/mouth feel

6.7 ± 0.4

6.8 ± 0.3

6.2 ± 0.7

0.000

ns

0.000

0.002

  Overall Liking

6.9 ± 0.2

6.9 ± 0.3

6.4 ± 0.6

0.000

ns

0.000

0.000

Amount offered, g (mean ± SD)

50.4 ± 0.5

50.2 ± 0.5

49.9 ± 1.2 (118.0 ± 12*)

ns

-

-

-

Amount consumed, g (mean ± SD)

23.8 ± 14

28.4 ± 15

17.1 ± 14 (40.8 ± 35*)

0.015

ns

0.012

ns

Percent of food consumed from offered food (%)

47.2 ± 28

56.7 ± 31

34.4 ± 28

0.017

ns

0.014

ns

Energy received from consumed food (mean ± SD), Kcal

125 ± 76

152 ± 83

64 ± 53

0.000

ns

0.000

0.005

Feeding time, minutes (mean ± SD)

23.0 ± 10

20.7 ± 10

20.4 ± 7

ns

-

-

-

Velocity, g/min

1.3 ± 1.0

1.9 ± 2.2

0.8 ± 0.8

0.020

ns

0.016

ns

  1. ns: Not significant at 5% level; *after adding water; 1ANOVA; 2post-hoc.