Skip to main content

Table 2 Bone mineral density at baseline, after 12-months and mean of difference within groups according to resistance training participation (n = 91)

From: Resistance training presents beneficial effects on bone development of adolescents engaged in swimming but not in impact sports: ABCD Growth Study

Variables

Impact sports + RT (n = 21)

Impact sports only (n = 45)

Swimming + RT

(n = 8)

Swimming only

(n = 17)

Crude aBMD (g/cm2)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Upper limbs

    

Baseline

0.827 (0.114)

0.798 (0.116)

0.865 (0.066)

0.750 (0.115)

Follow-up

0.901 (0.106)

0.859 (0.103)

0.927 (0.069)

0.812 (0.080)

Mean of change

0.074 (0.055)

0.062 (0.050)

0.062 (0.021)

0.062 (0.052)

Mean of change adjusted#

0.077 (0.055 to 0.099)

0.060 (0.046 to 0.074)

0.096 (0.074 to 0.118)

0.046 (0.032 to 0.060)

Lower limbs

    

Baseline

1.299 (0.158)

1.259 (0.181)

1.234 (0.119)

1.127 (0.135)

Follow-up

1.352 (0.144)

1.348 (0.178)

1.277 (0.119)

1.192 (0.130)

Mean of change

0.053 (0.043)

0.089 (0.056)

0.043 (0.019)

0.065 (0.036)

Mean of change adjusted#

0.066 (0.043 to 0.088)

0.084 (0.069 to 0.098)

0.054 (0.032 to 0.078)

0.060 (0.045 to 0.074)

Spine

    

Baseline

1.120 (0.152)

1.019 (0.141)

1.133 (0.082)

0.974 (0.150)

Follow-up

1.148 (0.137)

1.057 (0.137)

1.063 (0.088)

0.939 (0.125)

Mean of change

0.028 (0.064)

0.038 (0.052)

-0.069 (0.062)

-0.035 (0.059)

Mean of change adjusted#

0.039 (0.015 to 0.064)

0.033 (0.017 to 0.049)

-0.045 (-0.085 to -0.004)

-0.047 (-0.073 to -0.021)

WBLH

    

Baseline

1.077 (0.123)

1.041 (0.134)

1.057 (0.083)

0.951 (0.112)

Follow-up

1.131 (0.114)

1.105 (0.130)

1.072 (0.088)

0.979 (0.085)

Mean of change

0.054 (0.041)

0.064 (0.042)

0.015 (0.018)

0.028 (0.036)

Mean of change adjusted#

0.065 (0.047 to 0.082)

0.059 (0.048 to 0.071)

0.039 (0.024 to 0.054)

0.017 (0.007 to 0.026)

  1. RT = Resistance training; SD = standard deviation; aBMD = areal bone mineral density; # results presented in mean and 95% confidence interval and from GLM model of comparisons between groups (sport alone vs. sport + RT) adjusted by maturity offset, sex, and aBMD of each segment at baseline