Skip to main content

Table 3 Total number and proportion of children categorized as having borderline and abnormal scores

From: Use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in child and school health services among children aged 4 and 6 years in Southern Norway: clinical considerations

 

UK [20]

Sweden [18]

Denmark [19]

Norway 1

Borderline

Abnormal

Borderline

Abnormal

Borderline

Abnormal

Borderline

Abnormal

Sum/ratio

Sum/ratio

Sum/ratio

Sum/ratio

Sum/ratio

Sum/ratio

Sum/ratio

Sum/ratio

Total difficulties

28

25

85

79

99

54

84

74

0.042

0.038

0.128

0.119

0.149

0.081

0.126

0.111

Emotional symptoms

49

57

138

120

30

38

129

84

0.074

0.086

0.208

0.180

0.045

0.057

0.194

0.126

Peer problems

29

24

82

98

77

53

50

130

0.044

0.036

0.123

0.147

0.116

0.080

0.075

0.195

Conduct problems

48

31

51

66

87

66

46

128

0.072

0.047

0.077

0.099

0.131

0.099

0.069

0.192

Hyperactivity

31

41

114

154

110

58

83

102

0.047

0.062

0.171

0.232

0.165

0.087

0.125

0.153

Prosocial

32

26

87

46

61

39

102

100

0.048

0.039

0.131

0.069

0.092

0.059

0.153

0.150

N

665

665

665

665

665

665

665

665

  1. The table shows the total number and proportion of children categorized as borderline and abnormal when suggested cutoff values from the UK, Sweden and Denmark were applied, respectively. The corresponding cutoff values are presented in Table 2. We used the age-appropriate cutoff values and separated between genders if the cutoff values were different. For the UK cutoff values, the norms for children aged 2–4 years were applied to the 4-year-old children in our study. For the Swedish cutoff values, the norms for 4- and 5-year-old children were applied. For the Danish cutoff values, the norms for children aged 5–7 years were applied. In cases where the cutoff values were similar for the borderline and abnormal scores, we only included individuals in the abnormal group. 1The Norwegian numbers are based on the 80th and 90th (10th and 20th for the prosocial score) percentiles from the present study