Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of TSB(μmol/L), MCV(fL), RDW-CV(%) and RDW-SD(fL) among the groups

From: The application value of mean red blood cell volume and red blood cell volume distribution width combined with total serum bilirubin in the early screening of neonatal hemolytic disease

  

Early group

Late group

Z

P

TSB

HDN group

230.7 (185.5, 284.6) a

301.7(269.5, 341.9)b

-8.147

 < 0.001

Non-HDN group

152.4(60.4, 241.9)

295.4(261.8, 336.4)

-12.817

 < 0.001

MCV

HDN group

99.6 (96.2, 102.6) a

96.4(93.2, 98.4)a

-6.468

 < 0.001

Non-HDN group

96.3(93.2, 101.1)

93.8(91.1, 96.5)

-5.702

 < 0.001

RDW-CV

HDN group

16.8 (16.0, 17.9) a

15.2(14.7, 15.9)c

-10.528

 < 0.001

Non-HDN group

15.7(15.2, 16.7)

15.1(14.7, 15.7)

-6.871

 < 0.001

RDW-SD

HDN group

59.1 (56.1, 64.0) a

53.1(51.4, 56.1)a

-9.136

 < 0.001

Non-HDN group

55.2(52.2, 59.2)

51.8(49.9, 54.3)

-7.38

 < 0.001

  1. In the early stage, compared with the non-HDN group, a P < 0.001, Z values were -8.129, -4.88, -7.654, -6.557, respectively; In the late stage, compared with the non-HDN group, b p = 0.504, a p < 0.001, c p = 0.192 and Z values were -0.669, -4.425, -1.304, -3.563, respectively
  2. TSB Total serum bilirubin, MCV Mean corpuscular volume, RDW-CV Coefficient of variation of red blood cell volume distribution width, RDW-SD Standard deviation of red blood cell volume distribution width