Skip to main content

Table 5 Correlations between 2D:4D, maturity status measures and physical fitness changes

From: Does maturity estimation, 2D:4D and training load measures explain physical fitness changes of youth football players?

2D:4D measures

S&R

VIFT

Mod.505 COD

PP

Left 2D

r=-.07 | p = .72

r = .01 | p = .96

r=-.39 | p = .05*

r = .04 | p = .82

Left 4D

r=-.11 | p = .57

r = .11 | p = .58

r=-.41 | p = .04*

r = .01 | p = .99

LF2D:4D

r = .10 | p = .60

r=-.24 | p = .23

r = .03 | p = .88

r = .10 | p = .61

Right 2D

r=-.02 | p = .92

r = .01 | p = .98

r=-.45 | p = .02*

r = .05 | p = .79

Right 4D

r=-.04 | p = .83

r = .05 | p = .79

r=-.44 | p = .03*

r = .01 | p = .94

RF2D:4D

r = .05| p = .78

r=-.09 | p = .66

r=-.06 | p = .74

r = .07 | p = .72

R-L2D:4D

r=-.04| p = .84

r = .15 | p = .46

r=-.13 | p = .52

r=-.01 | p = .95

Maturity Status

S&R

VIFT

Mod.505 COD

PP

Maturity offset

r=-.07 | p = .71

r=-.09 | p = .64

r = .41 | p = .04*

r = .22 | p = .28

Age at PHV

r=-.02 | p = .89

r = .10 | p = .61

r = .07 | p = .73

r=-.01 | p = .93

  1. PHV peak height velocity, D digit, RF2D:4D right finger 2-digit:4-digit, LF2D:4D, left finger 2-digit:4-digit, RL2D:4D Right-Left 2D:4D, TM training monotony, TS training strain, mTL mean training load, wTL weekly training load, 5d-AVG 5 day average, S&R sit and reach test, 30 − 15 IFT 30 − 15 intermittent fitness test, PP peak power
  2. * Denotes significance at p < .05