Skip to main content

Table 3 Detailed scores of policy options in Round 3 of Delphi for each criterion

From: Setting and prioritizing evidence-informed policies to control childhood obesity in Iran: a mixed Delphi and policy dialogue approach

policy options

Total score

Effectiveness

Relevance

Feasibility

Acceptable cost

Acceptability to

health equity promotion

Easy monitoring

politicians

society

executives

The healthy school (healthy nutrition, physical activity, and health education)

4.48

5

5

4

4

4

5

5

5

4

Creating a healthy environment in kindergartens and other child-caring centers

4.14

5

5

4

4

4

5

4

4.5

4

Educating on appropriate supplementary feeding

4.17

4

5

4

4

4

4

4

5

4

Educating on healthy lifestyles in mass media

4.10

4

5

4

3.5

3.5

4

4

4.5

4

Increasing access to physical activity facilities with a priority for deprived areas

4.02

4

4.5

3.5

3

4

4

4

5

4

Developing a guideline on “nutrition, physical activity, and children’s lifestyle.”

4

4

4.5

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

More support for breastfeeding

3.98

4

5

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

Enhancing pregnancy cares

3.95

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

Increasing the involvement of stakeholders in the policymaking process

3.95

4.5

5

3.5

4

4

4

4

4

3

Enhancing the control of advertising

3.95

4

5

3

3

3

4

4

4

4

Advocacy for childhood obesity control

3.93

4

4

3

4

3

4

4

4

3

Increasing consultation and collaboration with an international organization

3.9

4

4

4

4

3

4

4

4

4

Increasing intersectional collaboration for better implementation of the policies

3.9

4.5

4

3

4

3.5

4

4

4

3.5

Providing better health care in PHC with a priority given to prevention

3.88

4

5

3.5

4

4

4

4

4.5

4

Modifying and better implementing the ratified policies

3.86

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

3.5

Enhancing academic education related to obesity in medical schools

3.86

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

Developing, ratifying, and notifying the policy package “Enhancement of Nutrition and Physical Activity in Children.”

3.86

4

4

3

4

4

4

4

4

3.5

Social marketing to combat childhood obesity

3.86

5

4

4

4

3.5

4

4

4

3

Improving food labeling

3.81

4

4

4

4

4

4

3

4

4

Subsidizing healthy foods

3.81

4

4

3

3

3

4

4

4.5

3

Ensuring weight management cares

3.79

4

4

3

3

3

4

3.5

4.5

4

Taxation on unhealthy foods

3.76

4

4

3

4

3

4

4

4

3

Modifying food baskets of supporting institutions

3.6

4

4

4

3

3

4

3.5

4

4

Modifying agricultural and commerce policies to provide nutrients rather than the sole energy

3.57

4

4

3

3

3

4

3

4.5

3

Food reformulation

3.57

4

4

3

3

3

4

4

4

3

A conditional cash transfer to families

3.55

4

4

3

3

3

3

4

4

3

Environmental reengineering to increase the possibility of physical activity

3.55

4

4

3

3

3

4

4

4

3.5

  1. Options are sorted based on the Med of the total score
  2. Results are presented as the Med of scores
  3. A description of these policies is provided in Supplementary Table 2
  4. A description of scoring criteria is provided in Supplementary Table 1