Skip to main content

Table 4 Anthropometry and body composition outcomes

From: Vibration therapy in young children with mild to moderate cerebral palsy: does frequency and treatment duration matter? A randomised-controlled study

Parameters (units)

n

Control period

12VT

20VT

12VT vs Control

20VT vs Control

Anthropometry

Height (z-score)

30

−0.63 (− 0.72, − 0.55)

−0.60 (− 0.69, − 0.52)

−0.58 (− 0.67, − 0.49)

0.03 (− 0.05, 0.12)

0.06 (− 0.05, 0.16)

Weight (z-score)

30

−0.50 (− 0.60, − 0.39)

−0.51 (− 0.62, − 0.40)

−0.40 (− 0.52, − 0.29)

−0.02 (− 0.14, 0.10)

0.10 (− 0.05, 0.24)

BMI (z-score)

30

−0.19 (− 0.35, − 0.03)

−0.23 (− 0.40, − 0.06)

−0.11 (− 0.28, 0.07)

−0.04 (− 0.25, 0.17)

0.08 (− 0.15, 0.32)

aBMD

TBLH (g/cm2)

30

0.631 (0.612, 0.650)

0.633 (0.624, 0.641)

0.633 (0.614, 0.651)

0.002 (−0.018, 0.022)

0.002 (−0.033, 0.036)

TBLH (z-score)

30

−0.97 (−1.06, − 0.89)

−0.94 (− 1.02, − 0.85)

−0.93 (− 1.01, − 0.84)

0.03 (− 0.03, 0.11)

0.05 (− 0.05, 0.14)

Spine L1-L4 (g/cm2)

29

0.685 (0.662, 0.707)

0.691 (0.682, 0.701)

0.699 (0.676, 0.723)

0.007 (−0.018, 0.031)

0.015 (− 0.029, 0.058)

Spine L1-L4 (z-score)

27

−0.71 (− 0.79, − 0.63)

−0.63 (− 0.72, − 0.54)

−0.57 (− 0.66, − 0.48)

0.08 (− 0.02, 0.18)

0.14 (0.03, 0.26)*

BMC

TBLH (g)

30

741 (714, 768)

763 (749, 776)

772 (745, 800)

21 (−7, 50)

31 (−18, 81)

Spine L1-L4 (g)

29

21.7 (20.4, 23.0)

23.2 (22.6, 23.7)

23.9 (22.5, 25.2)

1.5 (0.0, 2.9)*

2.2 (−0.3, 4.7)

Lean mass

Legs (kg)

30

5.9 (5.6, 6.3)

6.0 (5.9, 6.2)

6.1 (5.8, 6.5)

0.1 (−0.3, 0.4)

0.2 (−0.5, 0.8)

Fat mass

Total (%)

30

28.6 (28.3, 28.9)

28.8 (28.5, 29.2)

28.8 (28.4, 29.2)

0.2 (−0.3, 0.7)

0.2 (−0.3, 0.7)

  1. 12VT, assessment after 12 weeks of side-alternating vibration therapy; 20VT, assessment after 20 weeks of side-alternating vibration therapy; aBMD, areal bone mineral density; BMC, bone mineral content; BMI, body mass index; TBLH, total body less head
  2. Data at each assessment are the adjusted means and 95% confidence intervals (CI), while differences between assessments are the adjusted mean differences and 95% CI; all values were derived from linear mixed models based on repeated measures including the participant’s GMFCS level, randomisation group (20 Hz / 25 Hz), the baseline value of the outcome, as well as the number of days elapsed from baseline (except for anthropometric outcomes)
  3. n is the number of participants at baseline; the number of participants who completed a given assessment is provided in Additional file 1
  4. Statistically significant differences (at p < 0.05) between assessments are shown in bold, where *p < 0.05 indicates a pairwise difference compared to the Control period