Skip to main content

Table 2 Mobility parameters outcomes

From: Vibration therapy in young children with mild to moderate cerebral palsy: does frequency and treatment duration matter? A randomised-controlled study

Parameters

n

Control period

12VT

20VT

12VT vs Control

20VT vs Control

20VT vs 12VT

6MWT ITT (m)

34

406 (391, 422)

407 (391, 423)

429 (413, 446)

0 (− 12, 13)

23 (6, 39)**

22 (9, 36)††

6MWT PPA (m)

29

421 (404, 438)

422 (405, 439)

444 (427, 462)

1 (−12, 15)

23 (6, 41)*

22 (8, 37)††

10MWT (m/s)

25

2.27 (2.12, 2.42)

2.36 (2.21, 2.51)

2.46 (2.29, 2.62)

0.09 (− 0.05, 0.26)

0.18 (0.00, 0.37)*

0.10 (− 0.06, 0.25)

  1. 6MWT 6-minute walk test; 10MWT 10-m walk test; 12VT assessment after 12 weeks of side-alternating vibration therapy; 20VT assessment after 20 weeks of side-alternating vibration therapy; ITT intention-to-treat analysis; PPA per-protocol analysis
  2. Data at each assessment are the adjusted means and 95% confidence intervals (CI), while differences between assessments are the adjusted mean differences and 95% CI; all values were derived from linear mixed models based on repeated measures including the participant’s GMFCS level, randomisation group (20 Hz / 25 Hz), and the baseline value of the outcome as a covariate
  3. p-values for statistically significant differences (at p < 0.05) between two given assessments are shown in bold; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 for pairwise differences compared to the Control period; ††p < 0.01 for a difference between 12VT and 20VT
  4. n is the number of participants at baseline; the number of participants who completed a given assessment is provided in Additional file 1