Skip to main content

Table 5 Summary results of descriptive synthesis with levels of evidence statement for spinal MANIPULATION to manage paediatric populations with a variety of conditions

From: Spinal manipulation and mobilisation in the treatment of infants, children, and adolescents: a systematic scoping review

Conditions (Population)

Levels of Evidence Statement

Adverse Events Documented in reviews and studies included in the descriptive synthesis

Reviews

High-Quality Studies

Summary Statement

Original Report (Author & Year)

Adverse Event / (Practitioner Type)

Further cited by

Spinal MANIPULATION

 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ^ (AIS)

(C&A)

Inconclusive

Insufficient

Inconclusive

Rowe (2006)

Two benign reactions (no further detail documented) (Chiropractic)

Theroux (2017) [107]

Todd (2015) [108]

 Asthma

(C&A)

Inconclusive

STRONG Evidence of No Significant Effect

STRONG Evidence of

No Significant Effect #

   

 ASD ^

(C&A)

Inconclusive

-

Inconclusive

   

 Spinal (Back / Neck) Pain ^

(C&A)

(Combined Chronic and Acute Pain)

Inconclusive

Inconclusive

Inconclusive

*Evans (2018)

Unusual or increased soreness (51%-54%) and different type of pain (31%-34%) (Chiropractic)

 

L’Ecuyer (1959)

Neck pain in 12-year-old girl with a history of congenital torticollis, progression to unsteady gait, poor coordination, drowsiness, and hospitalisation with delayed diagnosis of congenital occipitalisation. (Chiropractic)

Green (2020) [21]

Vohra (2007) [110]

Ziv (1983)

Back pain in 12-year-old girl with history of osteogenesis imperfecta—progressive neuromuscular deficits in legs, clonus at rest, urinary urgency and frequency, paraplegia. (Chiropractic)

Vohra (2007) [110]

 Breastfeeding Difficulties ^

(I)

Inconclusive

-

Inconclusive

   

 CP ^

(I, C, A)

Inconclusive

Insufficient

Inconclusive

   

 Headache

(C&A)

Insufficient

STRONG Evidence of

No Significant Effect

STRONG Evidence of No Significant Effect

Borusiak (2010)

Hot skin and dizziness, transitory increase in headache intensity and frequency and loss of consciousness in both treatment sessions; quick recovery once treatment stopped. (Manual therapist)

Green (2020) [21]

Zimmerman (1978)

Severe occipital and bifrontal headache, vomiting, left facial weakness, diplopia ataxia. (Chiropractic)

Vohra (2007) [110]

Held (1966)

Acute respiratory decompensation, tracheotomy, neurologic deficits at C6 and C7 vertebrae, neck pain. (Medical practitioner)

Vohra (2007) [110]

 Infantile Colic – crying

(I)

Inconclusive

Inconclusive

Inconclusive

Miller (2012)

One child in comparison group reported an AE of increased crying. Incidence of increased crying in comparison group:2.94% (0.52, 14.92) (Chiropractic)

Corso (2020) [73]

Shafrir (1992)

In three of these studies a small number of mild harms was reported; the other two studies (n = 145) reported no harms. One study (n = 956) reported side effects or reactions in children after chiropractic treatment (n = 557), but both side effects or reactions and treatment techniques were not specified. (Chiropractic)

Driehuis (2019) [26]

Ellwood (2020) [114]

 Infantile Colic^ – Sleeping

(I)

Inconclusive

Insufficient

Inconclusive

Koch (1998)

Vegetative reactions, bradycardia, tachycardia, and reflex apnoea recorded in more than half of patients. Although apnoea was of short duration (< 10 s) and reversible, it can be regarded as a potentially life-threatening adverse event. NB: Conditions were mixed (colic, opistotonus, hypertonus, wryneck, plagiocephaly, scoliosis, limb weakness and slobbering). (Chiropractic)

Brand (2005) [41]

Wilson (2012)

Severe: Rib fractures (7th and 8th posterior) (Chiropractic)

NB: referral reason not confirmed

Todd (2015) [108]

 Nocturnal Enuresis

(C&A)

VERY STRONG Evidence of No Significant Effect

-

VERY STRONG Evidence of No Significant Effect

Leboeuf (1991)

4 – 15-year-old children and adolescents: Severe headache, stiff neck and acute lumbar spine pain. (5th year Chiropractic students)

Green (2020) [21]

Vohra (2007) [110]

Hawk (2007) [98]

Glazener (2005) [44]

 Otitis Media ^

(I & C)

Inconclusive

Insufficient

Inconclusive

Sawyer (1999)

6-months to 6 years—Mid-back soreness and increased irritability (Academic Chiropractors)

Green (2020) [21]

Corso (2020) [73]

Vohra (2007) [110]

Hawk (2007) [98]

Pohlman (2012) [105]

Glazener (2005) [44]

 Torticollis ^

(I & C)

Insufficient

Insufficient

Insufficient

Jacobi (2001)

Subarachnoid haemorrhage and death of 3-month-old girl (presenting condition unclear) (Physiotherapist)

Green (2020) [21]

Vohra (2007) [110]

Ellwood (2020) [27]

Driehuis (2019) [26]

Brand (2005) [41]

Shafrir (1992)

Quadriplegia in 4-month-old boy, secondary to spinal cord astrocytoma; regressed to paraplegia (18 months postoperatively). (Chiropractic)

Todd (2015) [108]

Driehuis (2019) [26]

Ellwood (2020) [27]

  1. All findings presented in this table are a result of the descriptive synthesis presented in Supplementary File 5
  2. High quality evidence was not available to explore the effectiveness of spinal manipulation on individuals with the following conditions: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), dysfunctional voiding, KISS syndrome, upper cervical dysfunction
  3. Populations: I – Infants, C – Children, A – Adolescents
  4. #Asthma—spinal manipulation on paediatric populations had ‘no significant effect’ on pulmonary function and findings were inconclusive for peak expiratory flow, general asthma symptoms, severity levels and quality of life
  5. ^Additional high-quality research (e.g., RCTs) may be warranted
  6. All adverse events extracted from included systematic reviews, except those studies marked with * which have been extracted from individual studies
  7. Insufficient: Insufficient high-quality evidence available on the topic and further research may be warranted
  8. Inconclusive: Available evidence is inconclusive, and further research may be warranted
  9. No Significant Effect: High-quality evidence suggests the intervention is not effective and should not be used in clinical practice
  10. Significant Positive Effect: High-quality evidence suggests the intervention is effective and could be used when clinical reasoning supports its application