Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of aggression, EPQ, FES and QTI in two groups

From: Aggressive behaviors and associated factors in Chinese left-behind adolescents: a cross-sectional study

Variable

LBA (n = 1078)

Mean ± SD

NLBA (n = 3452)

Mean ± SD

P-value

Aggression

6.33 ± 6.35

5.78 ± 6.16

0.011

EPQ

 Extraversion

16.62 ± 4.78

16.98 ± 4.66

0.026

 Psychoticism

3.92 ± 3.42

3.54 ± 3.25

0.001

 Neuroticism

8.72 ± 5.46

8.20 ± 5.48

0.007

 Lie

14.55 ± 3.89

14.83 ± 3.75

0.034

FES

 Cohesion

6.91 ± 1.98

7.133 ± 1.93

0.001

 Conflict

2.47 ± 1.94

2.28 ± 1.83

0.004

 Achievement

8.17 ± 1.42

8.29 ± 1.43

0.018

 Intellectual-Cultural

4.65 ± 1.86

4.73 ± 1.89

0.245

 Active-Recreational

3.45 ± 2.04

3.51 ± 2.07

0.391

 Organization

6.21 ± 1.99

6.31 ± 1.96

0.172

 Control

4.00 ± 1.80

3.86 ± 1.81

0.021

QTI

 Leadership

17.69 ± 4.28

18.37 ± 3.95

0.000

 Helpful/Friendly

16.34 ± 5.30

16.99 ± 5.11

0.000

 Understanding

19.09 ± 4.42

19.73 ± 4.27

0.000

 Student responsibility/Freedom

11.86 ± 4.19

12.29 ± 4.25

0.004

 Uncertainty

6.20 ± 3.92

6.21 ± 4.34

0.932

 Dissatisfaction

4.70 ± 4.88

4.77 ± 5.32

0.686

 Admonishing

7.67 ± 4.00

7.80 ± 4.18

0.388

 Strict behavior

14.51 ± 4.63

14.81 ± 4.53

0.066

  1. Abbreviation: SD Standard Deviation, EPQ Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, FES Family Environment Scale, QTI Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction