Skip to main content

Table 5 Scoping review articles included in this review

From: Parent values and preferences underpinning treatment decision-making in poor-prognosis childhood cancer: a scoping review

First Author, Publication year

Title of Study

Journal

Country of Origin

Research Methods

Study Design

Sample Size

No of Mothers

No of Fathers

Study Aim

Authors Main Findings

Hinds, P.S. et al. (1996) [32]

Coming to Terms: Parents’ Response to a First Cancer Recurrence in their child

Nursing Research

USA

Semi-structured interviews, observations

Qualitative

33

27

5

Identify and describe the coping processes (meaning the behaviours and thoughts) used by parents of pediatric oncology patients to deal with stress of a first cancer recurrence in their child

“Coming to terms”: meant adapting to the situation, managing emotional reactions, making rational decisions in the hope for a cure whilst recognising their child may die. Concerns about treatment impacting on employment, finances, and family life. Fear of their child dying, hence fighting for a cure, searching for outcomes, consideration of child’s wishes, faith, and religion

Hinds, P.S. et al. (1997) [8]

Decision Making by Parents and Healthcare Professionals when Considering Continued Care for Pediatric Patients with Cancer

Oncology Nursing Forum

USA

Semi-structured interviews, questionnaires

Retrospective-descriptive design

39

Not stated

Not stated

To better define the treatment related decisions considered most difficult by parents of paediatric patients with cancer and the factors that influence their final decisions

Uncertainty of treatment side effects, ongoing communication from healthcare professionals on disease and treatment was vital, importance of trust and reassurance in healthcare professionals, consideration of their child’s wishes, repeated treatment decisions led to the conclusion that their child would not get better

Hinds, P.S. et al. (2000) [33]

An International Feasibility Study of Parental Decision Making in Pediatric Oncology

Oncology Nursing Forum

USA

Open-ended interviews

Qualitative Exploratory descriptive cross-sectional design

43

38

5

To describe parental decision making about treatment options for children with cancer and determine the feasibility of a similar but larger international study

Continuing with treatment was seen as doing everything possible to save child’s life, parents were satisfied if decisions made had a positive outcome, ongoing communication from healthcare professionals on disease and treatment was vital, consideration of child’s wishes, faith, and religion

Bluebond-Langner, M. et al. (2007) [35]

Understanding Parents’ Approaches to Care and Treatment of Children with Cancer when Standard Therapy has Failed

Journal of Clinical Oncology

USA

Semi-structured interviews, observation

Qualitative Prospective Ethnographic study

34

Not stated

Not stated

To examine US and UK parents’ approaches to care and treatment when standard therapy has failed and consider implications for clinical practice

Hope was leaving “no stone unturned”, seeking other treatment options, allowing time for treatments to work, for treatments to become available and more time with their child. Pursuing treatments whilst caring, protecting, and advocating for their child to prolong life, decrease suffering and keep all treatment options open

De Graves (2008) [38]

Lving with Hope and Fear – The Uncertainty of Childhood Cancer after Relapse

Cancer Nursing

Australia

In-depth interviews and field notes (case studies)

Qualitative Prospective Critical Ethnography

17

12

5

To develop an understanding of human actions and emotions that shape the experience of relapse, to question what influences the care provided at relapse, and to challenge current practice

Maintaining hope, pursuing treatments despite potential harm or suffering, exploring alternative therapies to reduce the fear of their child dying

Mack et al. (2008) [36]

Parents’ Views of Cancer-Directed Therapy for Children with No Realistic Chance of Cure

Journal of Clinical Oncology

USA

Close-ended questionnaires, vignettes

Quantitative

141

117

24

Assess parents’ experiences with treatment for their child with cancer and no realistic chance of cure

Hope for a cure, prolonging life and decreasing suffering

Hinds et al. (2009) [34]

“Trying to be a Good Parent” As defined by Interviews with Parents who made Phase I, Terminal Care and Resuscitation Decisions for their Child

Journal of Clinical Oncology

USA

Interviews

Qualitative Descriptive study

62

91.4%

44.8%

To define what it means to be a good parent to a child with incurable cancer

Ongoing communication from healthcare professionals on disease and treatment, being a “good parent” included making informed decisions in the best interests of their child

Maurer et al. (2010) [37]

Decision Making by Parents of children with Incurable Cancer who opt for enrolment on a Phase I trial compared with Choosing a Do Not Resuscitate/Terminal Care option

Journal of Clinical Oncology

USA

Interviews

Qualitative (secondary analysis)

62

53

9

To compare the self-reported rationale, good parent definition, and desired clinical staff behaviours of parents who recently decided for phase 1 (P1) chemotherapy with parents who chose do not resuscitate (DNR) or terminal care (TC) option

Importance of trust and reassurance in healthcare professionals, managing positive relationships with healthcare professionals, making informed decisions which were “evidence-based”, in the best interests of their child was seen as “doing the right thing”

Tomlinson et al. (2011a) [40]

Concordance between couples Reporting their Child’s Quality of Life and their Decision Making in Pediatric Oncology Palliative Care

Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing

Canada

Hypothetical scenarios interview, format

Quantitative Cross-sectional study

26

13

13

To (1) describe concordance between fathers' and mothers' evaluation of QoL and (2) determine correlation between mother and father for how factors such as hope, anticipated QoL, and prolonged survival time influence the decision between supportive care alone versus aggressive chemotherapy

Maintaining hope outweighed their child’s quality of life and suffering, opinions of family members, other parents and healthcare professionals was influential, treatment provided more time with their child

Tomlinson et al. (2011b) [16]

Chemotherapy versus supportive Care alone in pediatric palliative care for cancer: comparing the preferences of parents and health care professionals

Canadian Medical Association Journal

Canada

Hypothetical interviews (prepared scripts, visual aids)

Quantitative

77

60

17

The goal of this study was to compare the strength of preference between parents and healthcare professionals for supportive care alone versus palliative chemotherapy for children whose cancer has no reasonable chance of being cured, and to determine how specific factors affect these preferences

The importance of hope outweighed their child’s quality of life and suffering, opinions of family members, other parents and healthcare professionals was influential, treatment provided more time with their child

Matsuoka et al. (2012) [18, 39]

Parents’ thoughts and perceptions on hearing that their child has incurable cancer

Journal of Palliative Medicine

Japan

Semi-structured open-ended interviews

Qualitative

23

16

7

To describe parental thoughts and perceptions when they hear that their child has incurable cancer

Continuing treatment was to not give up on their child, recognising death was not a potential reality with the focus on not allowing their child to die. This outweighed their child’s quality of life and suffering whilst acknowledging their child’s struggle to tolerate treatments

Mack et al. (2019) [17]

Unrealistic Parental Expectations for Cure in Poor-Prognosis Childhood Cancer

Cancer

USA

Questionnaires

Quantitative Prospective cohort study

95

81%

19%

The goal of the current study was to identify communication and care experiences that drive parents' care goals and decisions

Focus was to cure their child, allowing time for treatments to work and for treatments to become available