Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary data on dental caries experience by sociodemographic characteristics and responses to global items (brackets contain row percentages unless otherwise indicated)

From: Concurrent validity of the short-form Family Impact Scale (FIS-8) in 4-year-old US children

 

Number of children with 1 + d3mfta

Mean d3mft score (sd)a

Sociodemographic characteristics

 Sex

  Male

47 (22.3)

0.7 (1.9)

  Female

36 (18.3)

0.7 (2.0)

 Race of child

  White

11 (28.9)

0.4 (1.4)g

  Black

3 (50.0)

1.0 (2.0)

  Other

69 (19.0)

1.3 (2.9)

 Parental education

  Up to high school

33 (37.5)b

1.6 (2.9)h

  Some college

38 (16.7)

0.5 (1.4)

  Masters or above

12 (13.0)

0.3 (0.8)

 Language spoken at home

  English

64 (18.4)c

0.6 (1.6)i

  Other

19 (31.7)

1.2 (2.7)

 Employed adult in home

  No

15 (38.5)d

1.4 (2.6)j

  Yes

68 (18.4)

0.6 (1.7)

Responses to global items

 Health of child’s teeth or mouth

  Excellent

11 (7.7)e

0.3 (1.2)k

  Very good

29 (17.0)

0.4 (1.4)

  Good

27 (37.5)

1.5 (2.8)

  Fair

13 (72.2)

3.6 (3.2)

  Poor

2 (100.0)

5.5 (0.7)

 How much are your family’s daily lives affected by child’s teeth, lips, jaws or mouth?

  Not at all

47 (16.4)f

0.6 (1.7)l

  Very little

24 (25.5)

0.9 (2.2)

  Some

9 (52.9)

2.2 (2.8)

  A lot

1 (14.3)

0.1 (0.4)

  Very much

1 (33.3)

3.3 (5.8)

All combined

83 (20.3)

0.7 (1.8)

  1. aOne or more teeth with cavitated caries lesions; caries experience data missing for 14 children
  2. bP < 0.001; df = 3; Chi-square = 20.13
  3. cP = 0.03; df = 1; Chi-square = 5.53
  4. dP = 0.02; df = 1; Chi-square = 5.35
  5. eP < 0.001; df = 4; Chi-square = 66.49
  6. fP = 0.003; df = 4; Chi-square = 15.98
  7. gP = 0.003; df = 2; Kruskal–Wallis H = 22.91
  8. hP < 0.001; df = 2; Kruskal–Wallis H = 22.29
  9. iP = 0.03; df = 1; Mann–Whitney U test; Z = -2.14
  10. jP = 0.02; df = 1; Mann–Whitney U test; Z = -2.4
  11. kP < 0.001; df = 4; Kruskal–Wallis H = 74.84
  12. lP = 0.001; df = 4; Kruskal–Wallis H = 17.61