Skip to main content

Table 2 Themes, sub-themes and codes

From: Parents’ perceptions of functional electrical stimulation as an upper limb intervention for young children with hemiparesis: qualitative interviews with mothers

Themes

Sub-themes

Codes

1) Parents’ expectations for the FES intervention

a) Functional, exploratory, and realistic goals

- Functional goals

- Explore potential of FES

- Value of research

- Complete recovery not expected

- Expectations on retention

- Goal of maintenance

b) Initial apprehension towards FES

- Concerned about child’s tolerance of stimulation

- Potential impact of sensory challenges

2) Perceived improvement

a) Physical

- Reduced tone

- Increased range of motion

- Increased awareness and sensation

- Decreased range of motion

- Rate of physical improvement

b) Functional

- Improvements in dressing

- Improvements in feeding

- Improvements in play

- New uses of affected arm

- Increased frequency of unprompted arm use

- Improved movement planning

c) Psychological

- Improved confidence

- Pride in new abilities

d) Still room for improvement

- Progress made

- Potential for more improvement

3) Factors influencing the FES intervention

a) Structure

- Flexibility of structure is beneficial

- Volume is beneficial

- Volume is a challenge

- Travel time is a challenge

- Therapy worth travel time

b) Therapist factors

- Flexibility of therapist

- Individualization in sessions

- Rapport with child

c) Child factors

- Characteristics of child that facilitated FES

- Child not always cooperative

- Child needs to be comfortable with therapist

- Tolerance of electrical stimulation

- Experiences with prior therapy facilitated FES

4) Lack of access to intensive therapy

a) Not provided in mainstream therapy

- Lack of public services

- Lack of regular therapy

- Different from conventional therapy

b) Wanting access to FES outside of the study

- Home FES

- Availability of FES in private sector

- Availability of FES for adults versus children

- Role as advocate for FES

c) Socioeconomic challenges to access

- Frequency of sessions

- Facilitators of participation

- Social class

- Cost of FES

5) Strategies to facilitate participation

a) Program structure and delivery

- Preference for FES at home

- Preference for FES outside of home

- Intensive camps

- FES with other therapies

- Child-friendly environments

- Assistance with transportation

b) Session delivery

- Distraction

- Strategies to increase familiarization with FES

- Incentives

- Warm-up

- Presence of parent at session