Skip to main content

Table 6 Means (M) and standard deviations (SD) for the main findings in this study in comparison with recent studies from other countries

From: Quality of life in children with cochlear implants in Kazakhstan

Language

Present study

Brewis et al. 2020 [29]

Byčkova et al. 2018 [20]

Zhao et al. 2019 [22]

Kumar et al. 2015 [23]

Kazakh and Russian

English

Lithuanian

Mandarin

English

Sample size

53

54

28

123

33

Range of age (years)

2.8-15

6.6-18.3

3.5-18.7

1.7-7.3

4-18

Age at assessment (years)

7.33 (3.28) a

12.2 (3.6)

6.1 (3.3)

3.37 (1.20)

9.85 (3.30)

Age at CI activation (years)

3.17 (1.62)

3.90 (2.41)b

2.41 (2.25)

2.06 (1.08)

2.47 (1.85)

Duration of CI experience (years)

4.21 (2.45)

8.21 (4.10)

3.7 (1.3)

1.36 (0.53)

7.47 (2.80)

Communication

3.59 (0.73)

4.15 (0.62)

3.90 (0.77)

3.45 (0.71)

3.93 (0.62)

General functioning

3.57 (0.51)

4.05 (0.51)

c

3.62 (0.50)

3.86 (0.47)

Self-reliance

3.80 (0.64)

3.88 (0.63)

3.30 (0.27)

3.55 (0.47)

3.71 (0.77)

Well-being and happiness

3.89 (0.53)

3.81 (0.60)

c

3.70 (0.45)

3.65 (0.62)

Social relations

3.85 (0.52)

3.87 (0.52)

4.05 (0.41)

3.72 (0.43)

3.85 (0.38)

Education

3.49 (0.45)

3.70 (0.64)

c

3.38 (0.47)

3.32 (0.50)

Effects of implantation

3.15 (0.60)

3.49 (0.62)

3.16 (0.46)

3.67 (0.69)

3.11 (0.70)

Supporting the child

3.87 (0.48)

3.46 (0.47)

3.89 (0.49)

3.66 (0.59)

3.74 (0.56)

  1. aStandard deviation (SD) in parenthesis
  2. b(n = 40) only for age at CI activation, (N = 54) for others of Brewis et al. [29] study
  3. cno information found in Byčkova et al. [20] study
  4. CI Cochlear implant
  5. Zhao et al. performed such table in 2019 for the first time. Full information for the reference: Brewis et al. [29], Byčkova et al. [20], Zhao et al. [22], Kumar et al. 2015