Bundle element | Adult A2F bundle | PICU LIBERATION bundle | Measures |
---|---|---|---|
A – Optimising analgesia | PAD guidelines - pain assessments using a valid and reliable instrument | Institutional analgesia and sedation guidelines • Stepwise introduction of analgesics first in agitated or distressed child • Assessment of pain at least fourth hourly, using the FLACC score [26, 27]. | Instances of • FLACC assessments/opportunities • Appropriate stepwise use of pain medication (percentage) • WAT [28] assessments/opportunities • Withdrawal instances Opioid and benzodiazepine use Instances of expressed breast milk and sucrose utilisation for procedural pain relief (number of prescriptions and administration episodes) Empathic questionnaire results (carers' perception of child’s pain management) |
B – spontaneous awakening and breathing trials | Guide for spontaneous awakening trial (SAT) if patients is receiving continuous or intermittent sedative infusions Guide for spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) if receiving mechanical ventilation | • Safety screening tool and checklist for SABT adapted for PICU to guide nurse-led SABTs • Safety screening tool and checklist for extubation readiness adapted for PICU to guide nurse enabled extubations | Instances of • SABT screening performed/opportunities, • SABT trials/opportunities, • Extubation assessments/opportunity, • Instances of nurse-enabled extubation/opportunity • Ventilator associated pneumonia • Failed extubations, accidental extubations requiring re-intubation within 1 h • Delay from extubation ready to time of extubation Hours/days without invasive ventilation Empathic questionnaire results (carers' perception of child’s spontaneous awakening and breathing trials) |
C – Choice of sedatives | PAD guidelines - agitation/sedation assessments using a valid and reliable instrument. | Institutional analgesia and sedation guidelines – • Discourage use of sedatives, only second-tier treatment in the management of an agitated, ventilated patient; benzodiazepines, chloralhydrate and ketamine discouraged unless clinically indicated • Assessment of sedation, agitation or arousal recommended at least fourth hourly, using the Richmond Agitation and sedation scale (RASS) [29] | Instances of • RASS assessments/ opportunities • Sedation goal set/ opportunities • Sedation titration performed appropriately/ opportunities • Number of patients with “deep sedation” (RASS > − 2) • Instances of PTSS • Medication side effects recorded (opioids, benzodiazepines, ketamine, chloral hydrate) • Medication errors recorded • CLABSI and CAUTI • Accidental line removal Sedative use (by number of classes of sedatives used e.g., Benzodiazepines, chloralhydrate, ketamine) Empathic questionnaire results (carers' perception of child’s sedation management) |
D – Early assessment and management of delirium | PAD guidelines - delirium assessments using a valid and reliable instrument | Institutional delirium checklist and guideline – • Guide to non-pharmacological (encouraged as first option) and pharmacological delirium management strategies. • Delirium assessment recommended at least daily, using the CAP-D38 | Instances of • CAP-D assessments/opportunities, • Delirium identified (instances), • Appropriate management plan followed/opportunities (instances of non-pharmacological interventions targeting delirium, instances of pharmacological interventions targeting delirium) • sleep adjuncts utilised (e.g. day/night routine; swaddling/nesting) Empathic questionnaire results (carers' perception of child’s delirium prevention management) |
E – Early mobility and rehabilitation | Guide to achieving mobility activities that were higher than active range of motion (i.e., dangling at edge of bed, standing at side of bed, walking to bedside chair, marching in place, walking in room or hall) | • A structured early mobilisation and rehabilitation program is commenced 24 h post admission to PICU. Children are classified into graded activity levels (Lizard, Koala, Wombat, Kangaroo) based upon the early mobilisation algorithm considering safety issues. • Assessment of physical function is completed by a paediatric physiotherapist, using the Children’s Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (cCPAx) [30] | Instances of • Graded activity level goals set as daily goal, • Instances of mobility level sign on patient’s door • Mobility activities administered per patient per day • Mobility levels achieved: Lizard – immobile, routine positioning and range of motion unless contraindications; Koala – in bed activities including sitting; Wombat – in bedspace activities including mobility out of bed/standing; Kangoroo – mobility out of bedspace including ambulatory* • Falls Immobility Deconditioning (assessment of physical function by instances of Children’s Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (cCPAx) Empathic questionnaire results (carers' perception of child’s mobility management) |
F – Family engagement and empowerment | A family member/significant other was educated on the A2F bundle and/or participated in at least one of the following: rounds; conference; plan of care; or A2F bundle related care | Consumer information material educating family/carers on PICU Liberation bundle including goal setting and execution, family participation in cares, neurodevelopmental and early mobilisation activities and rounds | Instances of • Tools used to ensure family inclusion (e.g. Daily goals chart updated with goals set, likes/dislikes on “getting to know you” form utilised), • Family participation in liberation goal setting, • Family participation in liberation goals activity (education provided on PICU liberation, cares, neurodevelopmental and early mobility activity, rounds, plan of care including baby liberation flower, instances of therapeutic cuddles, instances of trips outside the patient’s room) • Family communication with healthcare providers “have you been kept up to date?” • empathic questionnaire completion/opportunity Number of Questionnaires administered to assess family coping and staff meaning making. Empathic questionnaire results (carers' perception of engagement/inclusion/respect/care) |
G – Good Nutrition | Not part of adult A2F | Institutional nutritional checklists - Anthropometric assessments (actual weights rather than estimated weights), nutritional assessments recommended at least weekly, patient specific nutritional goals set. Paediatric growth charts completed. Oral feeding readiness assessments | Instances of • Patient weight assessment and weight estimates • Nutritional goals set, instances of nutritional goals achieved • Nutritional assessment tool used, • Weight obtained, instances of appropriate nutrition delivered (defined as 2/3 of requirements reached enterally or parentally from 48 h post I/V), deconditioning, ICU related weakness, cognition. • Nutrition free days. Referrals to speech pathology Oral feeding readiness assessments Nutrition delivery routes i.e. nasogastric, parenteral Empathic questionnaire results (carers' perception of child’s feeding and nutrition management) |
H – Humanism | Not part of adult A2F | Institutional strategies to identify patients' and families' personal, developmental, and cultural preferences developed - family goals documentation recommended at least second daily. | Instances of • Humanism goals set (inclduing photos printed and displayed at bedside, “getting to know you” form/careplan) • Humanism goals achieved, instances of utilisation of tools to help personalise the patient for the clinicians (e.g. “getting to know you”), • Individualised care/opportunity, number and results of questionnaires administered to measure meaning-making for staff and family coping (control charts). • Family awareness of resources such as children’s book library, photo printing service (and use of same) • Completion of “getting to know you” form Empathic questionnaire results (carers' perception of individualised care; use of care planning etc) |
Baby Liberation | Not part of adult A2F | Embedded in all PICU Liberation Bundle elements: Institutional strategies to ensure infant neurodevelopment is optimised – Baby Liberation goals documented on “flower” depicting categories of care such as family engagement, use of breast milk for mouth cares, nesting and swaddling etc. | Instances of Use of baby liberation flower use Use of adjuncts such as “zaky” hands, nesting, swaddling, cuddles Empathic questionnaire results (carers' perception of Baby Liberation programme) |
Overall bundle performance | “Complete performance” defined as patient-day in which every eligible element of the bundle was performed (i.e., 100% of the bundle versus anything less) “Proportional performance” defined as percentage of eligible elements a patient received on a given day (i.e., “bundle dose” in %) | Additional performance measures: Target setting (Each morning Liberation targets including SP, RASS, mobility targets are to be set within the multidisciplinary ward round and documented in the PICU clinical information system) Targets reached/adjusted: each afternoon during “check-ins” | Measurement of instances of performance of each bundle element per patient day (only measured if the patient was in PICU for a full 24 h from d3 of PICU stay) Instances of daily goals set/opportunity. Instances of Liberation check-ins completed/opportunity Empathic questionnaire instances/opportunity Empathic questionnaire results (carers' perception of Liberation program and individual elements) |