Skip to main content

Table 2 Categorical baseline characteristics with number and percentage of patients in each category

From: Effects of a novel mobile health intervention compared to a multi-component behaviour changing program on body mass index, physical capacities and stress parameters in adolescents with obesity: a randomized controlled trial

Factor

levels

Whole Cohort

PM

CON

p-value

Sex

female

13 (41.9%)

7 (38.9%)

6 (46.2%)

0.73

male

18 (58.1%)

11 (61.1%)

7 (53.8%)

 

Pubertal stage

5 (B5 / G5)

9 (34.6%)

4 (44.4%)

5 (55.6%)

 

4 (B4 / G4)

10 (38.5%)

5 (50%)

5 (50%)

 

3 (B3 / G3)

5 (19.2%)

5 (100%)

0 (0%)

 

1&2 (B1&2 / G1&2)

2 (7.7%)

1 (50%)

1 (50%)

 

Psychological/Behavioural problems

no

13 (41.9%)

8 (44.4%)

5 (38.5%)

1.00

yes

18 (58.1%)

10 (55.6%)

8 (61.5%)

 

Physiotherapy

no

29 (93.5%)

18 (100%)

11 (84.6%)

0.17

yes

2 (6.5%)

0 (0%)

2 (15.4%)

 

Psychotherapy

no

28 (90.3%)

15 (83.3%)

13 (100%)

0.25

yes

3 (9.7%)

3 (16.7%)

0 (0%)

 

Nutrition counseling

no

24 (77.4%)

13 (72.2%)

11 (84.6%)

0.67

yes

7 (22.6%)

5 (27.8%)

2 (15.4%)

 

School Performance*

1

1 (3.4%)

1 (6.2%)

0 (0%)

0.81

2

6 (20.7%)

4 (25.0%)

2 (15.4%)

 

> 3

22 (75.9%)

11 (68.8%)

11 (84.6%)

 
  1. P-values for differences between PathMate2 (PM) and control group (CON) were obtained using Fisher’s exact test. Pubertal stages were assessed according to Tanner staging [28, 29]. *Likert scale from 1 “not at all” to 5 “extremely (good)”