Skip to main content

Table 3 Association between post-extubation mode and other parameters

From: Reintubation rates after extubation to different non-invasive ventilation modes in preterm infants

Parameters

NCPAP

N = 97

NIPPV

N = 77

NC

N = 26

P-Value

Birth Weight (gm)

1686.7 ± 500.8

1408.5 ± 494.9

2101.9 ± 505.5

< 0.0001

(mean ± SD)

1555 (1342.5,

1320 (1020,

2140 (1631.3,

 

Median (IQR)

2011.3)

1685)

2412.5)

 

Birth Weight (gm)

  > 1000 g

93 (95.9)

60 (77.9)

26 (100)

< 0.0001

  ≤ 1000 g

4 (4.1)

17 (22.1)

0 (0)

 

Gestational Age (weeks)

31.2 ± 2.4

30 ± 2.3

33.6 ± 2.1

< 0.0001

Median (IQR)

31 (29, 33)

29 (28, 31)

34 (32, 36)

 

Apgar Score at 1 min

6.7 ± 2.3

6.7 ± 1.9

6.4 ± 3.1

0.891

Median (IQR)

7 (5, 9)

7 (5, 8)

8 (4.5, 9)

 

Apgar Score at 5 min

8.6 ± 1.6

8.5 ± 1.1

8.4 ± 1.9

0.934

Median (IQR)

9 (8, 10)

9 (8, 9)

9 (7.5, 10)

 

Duration of Mechanical Ventilation (days)

2.4 ± 2.3

3.4 ± 4.1

2.7 ± 2.8

0.105

Median (IQR)

1 (1, 3)

2 (1, 4)

2 (1, 3.3)

 

Duration of Non-Invasive Ventilation (days)

3.7 ± 5.3

3.6 ± 4.2

2.7 ± 2.4

 

Median (IQR)

2 (1, 4)

2 (1, 4)

2 (1, 3.8)

0.786

Days till reintubation

1.9 ± 1.85

2.7 ± 1.9

–

0.446

Median (IQR)

1 (1, 2)

2 (1, 4)

  

Age at Extubation (day)

2.52 ± 2.55

3.41 ± 3.91

3.56 ± 2.62

0.115

Median (IQR)

1 (1, 4)

2 (1, 4.3)

4 (1, 4.5)

 

Maternal GBS Status

 Negative

89 (91.8)

67 (88.2)

25 (96.2)

0.331

 Positive

6 (6.2)

9 (11.8)

1 (3.8)

 

 Unknown

2 (2.1)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 

Maternal Antenatal Steroids

 No

46 (47.9)

35 (45.5)

16 (61.5)

0.356

 Yes

50 (52.1)

42 (54.5)

10 (38.5)

 

Need for PPV during resuscitation

 No

44 (45.8)

22 (28.9)

13 (50)

0.042

 Yes

52 (54.2)

54 (71.1)

13 (50)

 

Need for resuscitation medication.

 No

95 (97.9)

77 (100)

25 (96.2)

0.309

 Yes

2 (2.1)

0 (0)

1 (3.8)

 

Surfactant Administration

 No

21 (21.6)

9 (11.7)

20 (76.9)

< 0.0001

 Yes

76 (78.4)

68 (88.3)

6 (23.1)

 

Number of Surfactant Doses

 1

57 (75)

35 (52.2)

6 (85.7)

0.022

 2

18 (23.7)

26 (38.8)

1 (14.3)

 

 3

1 (1.3)

6 (9)

0 (0)

 

Need for intubation during resuscitation.

 No

52 (53.6)

40 (51.9)

14 (53.8)

0.972

 Yes

45 (46.4)

37 (48.1)

12 (46.2)

 

Mode of Delivery

 Vaginal delivery

19 (19.8)

8 (10.4)

7 (26.9)

0.095

 Caesarian Section

77 (80.2)

69 (89.6)

19 (73.1)

 

Pre-extubation Ventilation Mode

 PC-AC + VG

90 (96.8)

73 (96.1)

24 (96)

0.416

 SIMV

3 (3.2)

1 (1.3)

1 (4)

 

 HFOV

0 (0)

2 (2.6)

0 (0)

 

Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA)

 No

81 (83.5)

54 (70.1)

23 (88.5)

0.044

 Yes

16 (16.5)

23 (29.9)

3 (11.5)

 

HsPDA*

 No

11 (64.7)

3 (13.0)

2 (66.7)

0.009

 Yes

6 (35.3)

20 (87.0)

1 (33.3)

 

Reintubation

 No

87 (88.8)

71 (91.0)

26 (100)

0.203

 Yes

11(11.2)

6 (9.0)

0 (0)

 

Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC)

 No

92 (94.8)

69 (89.6)

25 (96.2)

0.322

 Yes

5 (5.2)

8 (10.4)

1 (3.8)

 

Intestinal Perforation

 No

96 (99)

74 (96.1)

26 (100)

0.300

 Yes

1 (1)

3 (3.9)

0 (0)

 

Air Leak

 No

88 (90.7)

72 (93.5)

19 (73.1)

0.011

 Yes

9 (9.3)

5 (6.5)

7 (26.9)

 

BPD

 No

93 (95.9)

65 (84.4)

26 (100)

0.006

 Yes

4 (4.1)

12 (15.6)

0 (0)

 

BPD Grade

 Mild

2 (50)

9 (75)

 

0.350

 Moderate

2 (50)

3 (25)

  

Sepsis status

 No

94 (96.9)

74 (96.1)

26 (100)

0.922

 Yes

3 (3.1)

3 (3.9)

0 (0)

 
  1. Categorical data values are presented in n (%) and quantitative data values are presented in mean ± standard deviation (SD). Median and IQR were used for skewed or non-normal data.
  2. Yates corrected Chi-square test was applied in case of small cell frequencies (50% or more cells have expected frequencies < 5), whereas the quantitative outcome measures were compared by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test or Kruskal–Wallis test (for skewed data) as appropriate to compute respectively statistical P-value
  3. * HsPDA rate was computed among patients who had positive PDA (n = 48)
  4. This is a retrospective study design and for some parameters, the data values were incomplete due to the unavailability of the information in the patients’ record files and thus all the percentages values computed using non-missing values