Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of NBNA scores

From: Early combined rehabilitation intervention to improve the short-term prognosis of premature infants

Group

scores > 37

scores = 35–36

scores < 35

T-value

P-value

The intervention group

21

1

0

17.66

0.000b

The control group

23

5

1

  1. a There was no significant difference in the mean of NBNA scores between the two groups (P > 0.05)
  2. b Further statistical analysis and the Wilcoxon rank sum test showed that the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05)
Back to article page

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us