Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlations between motor proficiency composites (standard scores) and mathematical and reading outcomes (standard scores) for total sample

From: Associations between motor proficiency and academic performance in mathematics and reading in year 1 school children: a cross-sectional study

 

Fine manual control

Manual coordination

Body coordination

Strength and agility

Total motor composite

Mathematics composite (n = 55)

rs = .572 (<.001)*

r = .399 (.003)

rs = .296 (.028)

r = .389 (.003)

r = .466 (<.001)*

Maths reasoning (n = 55)

rs = .587 (<.001)*

r = .382 (.004)

rs = .264 (.051)

r = .354 (.008)

r = .448 (.001)*

Numerical operations (n = 55)

rs = .472 (<.001)*

r = .382 (.004)

rs = .264 (.051)

r = .387 (.004)

r = .439 (.001)*

Reading composite (n = 54)

rs = .476 (.001)*

rs = .299 (.028)

rs = .142 (.307)

rs = .180 (.193)

rs = .316 (.020)

Pseudoword decoding (n = 54)

rs = .438 (.001)*

rs = .296 (.030)

rs = .194 (.159)

rs = .195 (.158)

rs = .344 (.011)

Word reading (n = 55)

rs = .521 (<.001)*

r = .319 (.017)

rs = .154 (.263)

r = .215 (.115)

r = .362 (.007)

Reading comprehension (n = 54)

rs = .395 (.003)

r = .284 (.037)

rs = .029 (.832)

r = .144 (.298)

r = .270 (.048)

  1. Spearman’s rho (rs) and Pearson’s (r) correlation coefficients are reported as appropriate
  2. *p ≤ .05 (significant correlations after conducting Bonferroni correction at α = 0.05 / 35 = 0.0014)