Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive statistics for articulation, vocabulary, and reading tasks by cluster

From: Feature-driven classification reveals potential comorbid subtypes within childhood apraxia of speech

Variable

Cluster 1 (High severity)

(nā€‰=ā€‰10)

Cluster 2 (Moderate severity)

(nā€‰=ā€‰11)

Cluster 3 (Low severity)

(nā€‰=Ā 10)

Cluster 4 (Controls) (nā€‰=ā€‰8)

Kruskal-Wallis

P-value1

Mann-Whitney exact

P-value2

Mann-Whitney exact

P-value3

Mann-Whitney exact

P-value4

Mann-Whitney exact

P-value5

Mann-Whitney exact

P-value6

Mann-Whitney exact

P-value7

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

All clusters

Cluster 1 vs 2

Cluster 2 vs 3

Cluster 3 vs 4

Cluster 1 vs 3

Cluster 2 vs 4

Cluster 1 vs 4

EOWPVT

āˆ’1.32 (0.76)

[āˆ’1.33]

0.65 (0.83) [0.87]

0.05 (0.85)

[āˆ’0.13]

1.37 (0.60) [1.53]

<ā€‰0.001

<ā€‰0.001

0.12

0.003

0.003

0.03

<ā€‰0.001

GFTA

āˆ’0.70 (1.31)

[āˆ’1.00]

āˆ’ā€‰0.96 (0.69)

[āˆ’ā€‰1.08]

āˆ’1.00 (0.76)

[āˆ’ā€‰1.21]

1.38 (1.05) [1.68]

0.002

0.96

0.93

<ā€‰0.001

0.81

<ā€‰0.001

0.004

NWR

āˆ’1.17 (0.89)

[āˆ’ā€‰1.42]

āˆ’1.58 (0.50)

[āˆ’ā€‰1.66]

āˆ’ā€‰0.48 (0.63)

[āˆ’ā€‰0.39]

0.39 (1.40) [0.79]

0.002

0.31

<ā€‰0.001

0.20

0.09

0.002

0.02

PPVT

āˆ’1.45 (1.02)

[āˆ’ā€‰1.33]

0.08 (0.56) [0.07]

0.79 (0.91)

[0.97]

0.94 (0.85) [0.80]

<ā€‰0.001

<ā€‰0.001

0.07

0.70

<ā€‰0.001

0.01

<ā€‰0.001

WRMT-AT

āˆ’1.66 (0.99)

[āˆ’ā€‰1.37]

āˆ’1.07 (0.92) [āˆ’0.87]

0.19 (0.58)

[0.23]

0.37 (0.71) [0.60]

<ā€‰0.001

0.23

0.001

0.53

<ā€‰0.001

0.003

<ā€‰0.001

WRMT-ID

āˆ’1.55 (1.01)

[āˆ’ā€‰1.43]

āˆ’1.16 (0.79) [āˆ’ā€‰1.20]

0.05 (0.86)

[āˆ’0.07]

0.37 (0.54) [0.47]

<ā€‰0.001

0.46

0.004

0.37

<ā€‰0.001

<ā€‰0.001

<ā€‰0.001

DDK

āˆ’8.60

(7.08)

[āˆ’7.35]

āˆ’7.81

(7.89)

[āˆ’5.00]

āˆ’7.21

(7.48)

[āˆ’6.84]

āˆ’0.07

(0.68)

[āˆ’ā€‰0.15]

0.003

0.81

0.99

<ā€‰0.001

0.68

0.002

0.003

  1. Includes both CAS and controls. Values shown as mean (sd) [median]. P-values shown are not adjusted for multiple testing. 1Comparison of distribution across all four clusters. 2Comparison of distribution medians between clusters 1 and 2. 3Comparison of distribution between clusters 2 and 3. 4Comparison of distribution between clusters 3 and 4. 5Comparison of distribution between clusters 1 and 3. 6Comparison of distribution between clusters 2 and 4. 7Comparison of distribution between clusters 1 and 4