Skip to main content

Table 3 Risk reduction on emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmission (RA) visits due to scopolamine patch use among children with drooling

From: Efficacy of scopolamine transdermal patch in children with sialorrhea in a pediatric tertiary care hospital

Emergency department visits (ED):

  Rate of ED visits due to drooling before scopolamine patch use (CER) %

33.0

  Rate of ED visits due to drooling after scopolamine patch use (EER) %

5.4

  ARR on ED visits %= CER - EER = 33.0–5.4

27.6 (95%CI:9.4–45.6, p < 0.001))

  RRR on ER visits % = (CER – EER)/CER = (33.0–5.4)/33.0

86.0

  Relative risk (RR) = EER/CER = 5.4/33.0

0.16

Readmission visits (RA):

  Rate of RA visits due to drooling before scopolamine patch use (CER) %

44.4

  Rate of RA visits due to drooling after scopolamine patch use (EER) %

8.7

  ARR on RA visits %= CER - EER = 44.4–8.7

35.7(95% CI: 15.7–55.7, p < 0.001)

  RRR on RA visits %= (CER – EER)/CER = (44.4–8.7)/44.4

67.1

  Relative risk (RR) = EER/CER = 8.7/44.4

0.20

  1. CER Control event rate, EER Experimental event rate, RR Relative risk, ARR Absolute risk reduction, RRR Relative risk reduction