Effectiveness of instrumented gait analysis in interdisciplinary interventions on parents’ perception of family-centered service and on gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial

Table 5 Associations between MPOC-20 and GMFM-66

Independent variable: MPOC-20 52-weeks follow-up domain scores	(mean ± SE)	[95%CI]	p-value	Effect size (Eta²)
*enabling and partnership*	0.66 ± 0.39	[−0.14–1.45]	0.103	0.070
*providing general information*	0.27 ± 0.41	[−0.56–1.10]	0.511	0.003
*providing specific information about the child*	−0.27 ± 0.41	[−1.10–0.55]	0.510	0.002
*respectful and supportive service*	0.61 ± 0.44	[− 0.28–1.50]	0.175	0.055
*coordinated and comprehensive care*	0.23 ± 0.34	[− 0.46–0.91]	0.512	0.034

Dependent variable: GMFM-66 change score at the 52-week follow-up
Independent variable: MPOC-20 domains at the 52-week follow-up
Adjusted for relevant MPOC-20 domain score, sex, age, BMI SDS, CP spastic subtype, and GMFCS level
Abbreviations: GMFM-66 Gross Motor Function Measure, GMFCS Gross Motor Function Classification System, MPOC-20 Measure of Processes of Care, CI confidence intervals, SE standard error