Skip to main content

Table 2 Mean scores and between-group differences for KAP supporting a healthy lifestyle (n = 76)

From: Effectiveness of a school-based intervention on knowledge, attitude and practice on healthy lifestyle and body composition in Malaysian adolescents

Variablea

Pre

Post I

Post II

Mean (SD)

Adjusted mean

(95% CI)b

Adjusted mean difference

(95% CI)c

F

p-value

Adjusted effect sized

Adjusted mean

(95% CI)b

Adjusted mean difference

(95% CI)c

F

p-value

Adjusted effect sized

Knowledge

 IG

15.03 (3.22)

18.05 (16.36, 19.75)

3.34 (0.99, 5.69)*

8.03

0.006

0.10 (M)

18.02 (16.61, 19.44)

2.82 (0.86, 4.78)*

8.26

0.005

0.11 (M)

 CG

12.12 (3.62)

14.72 (13.27, 16.16)

    

15.20 (14.00, 16.40)

    

Attitude

 IG

108.97 (10.79)

107.43 (104.08, 110.77)

−0.30 (−4.86, 4.25)

0.02

0.895

0.00 (N)

107.78 (103.80, 111.76)

2.66 (−2.76, 8.07)

0.96

0.331

0.01 (S)

 CG

104.10 (11.37)

107.73 (104.82, 110.64)

    

105.12 (101.66, 108.58)

    

Practice

 IG

112.00 (11.73)

106.92 (103.40, 110.44)

−3.95 (−8.73, 0.83)

2.72

0.103

0.04 (S)

108.13 (103.67, 112.59)

−3.23 (−9.28, 2.82)

1.14

0.290

0.02 (S)

 CG

108.26 (11.72)

110.87 (107.82, 113.92)

    

111.37 (107.50, 115.23)

    
  1. *Significant difference (p < 0.05)
  2. aScore ranges: knowledge (0–32), attitude (24–144), practice (35–175). Higher scores in the respective scales indicate better knowledge of a healthy lifestyle, more positive attitudes towards a healthy lifestyle and a healthier lifestyle being practised
  3. bAdjusted mean using analysis of covariance after controlling for age, sex and pre-intervention variables
  4. cBonferroni adjustment for 95% confidence interval for differences
  5. dEffect sizes: 0.01 = small; 0.06 = moderate; 0.14 = large (Cohen, [34]); N = negligible, S = small; M = moderate